Sin, J; Elkes, J; Batchelor, R; Henderson, C; Gillard, S; Woodham, LA; Chen, T; Aden, A; Cornelius, V
(2021)
Mental health and caregiving experiences of family carers supporting people with psychosis.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci, 30.
e3.
ISSN 2045-7979
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020001067
SGUL Authors: Sin, Pui Han Jacqueline
Abstract
AIMS: Family carers supporting an individual with psychosis often experience poorer mental health, however, little is known about specific risk factors among these carers. We investigated the associations between demographic, caregiving characteristics and mental health outcomes in family carers supporting an individual with psychosis and compared carers' outcomes with general population norms. METHODS: We analysed baseline data from the COPe-support randomised controlled trial of online psychoeducation and peer support for adult carers supporting an individual with psychosis between 2018 and 2020. We collected carers' demographic and health outcome data, including wellbeing using Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS as primary outcome), quality of life using EQ-5D-5L and caregiving experience assessed with Experience of Caregiving Inventory. We tested associations between carers' demographic and caregiving characteristics for each outcome in turn and meta-analysed carers' WEMWBS and EQ-5D-5L with Health Survey England (HSE) general population data from 2016 and 2017, respectively. RESULTS: The 407 carers of people with psychosis had a mean WEMWBS score of 42.2 (s.d. 9.21) and their overall weighted pooled WEMWBS score was 7.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) -8.6 to -6.0, p < 0.01) lower than the HSE general population sample, indicating carers have poorer mental wellbeing by more than double the minimum clinically important difference of 3 points on WEMWBS. Among all caring relationships, partners had poorer wellbeing compared to parents with lower WEMWBS score (-6.8, -16.9 to 3.3, p = 0.03). Single carers had significantly poorer wellbeing (-3.6, -5.6 to -1.5, p < 0.01) and a more negative caregiving experience than those who were cohabiting. Spending more than 35 h per week caregiving increased carers' negative experience significantly (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Carers of people with psychosis have poorer mental health than non-carers. Partners, lone carers and those spending more than 35 h per week on caring were found to be most at risk of poor mental health. Based on the results, we advocate that the details of carers for individuals with psychosis should be added to the existing carers or severe mental illness registers at all general practitioner surgeries and for their wellbeing screened routinely. Future large-scale prospective studies are needed to develop a predictive model to determine risk factors, hence to aid early identification of carers' support needs. Such understandings are also useful to inform tailored intervention development.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re- use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. |
Keywords: |
Caregiving, family carers, psychosis, public mental health, quality of life, wellbeing, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Caregivers, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Young Adult, Humans, Family, Mental Health, Psychotic Disorders, Quality of Life, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Caregivers, Female, Male, Young Adult, Caregiving, family carers, psychosis, public mental health, quality of life, wellbeing |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci |
ISSN: |
2045-7979 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
8 January 2021 | Published | 8 November 2020 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
PubMed ID: |
33416043 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000605949400001 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112910 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020001067 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 05 Feb 2021.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |