Nielsen-Kudsk, JE; Korsholm, K; Damgaard, D; Valentin, JB; Diener, H-C; Camm, AJ; Johnsen, SP
(2021)
Clinical Outcomes Associated With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Versus Direct Oral Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 14 (1).
pp. 69-78.
ISSN 1876-7605
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.051
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx)
Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (1MB) |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate clinical outcomes associated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with high-risk atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: LAAO has been shown to be noninferior to warfarin for stroke prevention in AF. However, anticoagulation with DOACs is now preferred over warfarin as thromboprophylaxis in AF. METHODS: Patients with AF enrolled in the Amulet Observational Registry (n = 1,088) who had successful LAAO with the Amplatzer Amulet device (n = 1,078) were compared with a propensity score-matched control cohort of incident AF patients (n = 1,184) treated by DOACs identified from Danish national patient registries. Propensity score matching was based on the covariates of the CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism, vascular disease, age 65-74 years, sex category) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal or liver function, stroke, bleeding, labile international normalized ratio, elderly, drugs or alcohol) scores for predicting stroke and bleeding. The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium ≥3), or all-cause mortality, and follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: AF patients treated with LAAO had a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome as compared with patients treated with DOACs (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.67). Total events and event rates per 100 patient-years were (LAAO vs. DOACs) 256 vs. 461 and 14.5 vs. 25.7, respectively. The risk of ischemic stroke was comparable between groups (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.71 to 1.75), while risk of major bleeding (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49 to 0.79) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43 to 0.64) were significantly lower in patients treated with LAAO. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk AF patients, LAAO in comparison with DOACs may have similar stroke prevention efficacy but lower risk of major bleeding and mortality.
Item Type: | Article | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2021. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | |||||||||
Keywords: | atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage occlusion, stroke prevention, atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage occlusion, stroke prevention, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Cardiovascular System & Hematology | |||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) | |||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | JACC Cardiovasc Interv | |||||||||
ISSN: | 1876-7605 | |||||||||
Language: | eng | |||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | |||||||||
Projects: |
|
|||||||||
PubMed ID: | 33413867 | |||||||||
Go to PubMed abstract | ||||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112853 | |||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.051 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |