Ram, B;
Limb, ES;
Shankar, A;
Nightingale, CM;
Rudnicka, AR;
Cummins, S;
Clary, C;
Lewis, D;
Cooper, AR;
Page, AS;
et al.
Ram, B; Limb, ES; Shankar, A; Nightingale, CM; Rudnicka, AR; Cummins, S; Clary, C; Lewis, D; Cooper, AR; Page, AS; Ellaway, A; Giles-Corti, B; Whincup, PH; Cook, DG; Owen, CG
(2020)
Evaluating the effect of change in the built environment on mental health and subjective well-being: a natural experiment.
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 74 (8).
pp. 631-638.
ISSN 0143-005X
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213591
SGUL Authors: Cook, Derek Gordon Owen, Christopher Grant Limb, Elizabeth Sarah Whincup, Peter Hynes Rudnicka, Alicja Regina Nightingale, Claire Shankar, Aparna
Abstract
Background Neighbourhood characteristics may affect mental health and well-being, but longitudinal evidence is limited. We examined the effect of relocating to East Village (the former London 2012 Olympic Athletes’ Village), repurposed to encourage healthy active living, on mental health and well-being.
Methods 1278 adults seeking different housing tenures in East village were recruited and examined during 2013–2015. 877 (69%) were followed-up after 2 years; 50% had moved to East Village. Analysis examined change in objective measures of the built environment, neighbourhood perceptions (scored from low to high; quality −12 to 12, safety −10 to 10 units), self-reported mental health (depression and anxiety) and well-being (life satisfaction, life being worthwhile and happiness) among East Village participants compared with controls who did not move to East Village. Follow-up measures were regressed on baseline for each outcome with group status as a binary variable, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, housing tenure and household clustering (random effect).
Results Participants who moved to East Village lived closer to their nearest park (528 m, 95% CI 482 to 575 m), in more walkable areas, and had better access to public transport, compared with controls. Living in East Village was associated with marked improvements in neighbourhood perceptions (quality 5.0, 95% CI 4.5 to 5.4 units; safety 3.4, 95% CI 2.9 to 3.9 units), but there was no overall effect on mental health and well-being outcomes.
Conclusion Despite large improvements in the built environment, there was no evidence that moving to East Village improved mental health and well-being. Changes in the built environment alone are insufficient to improve mental health and well-being.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
Keywords: |
Epidemiology, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1604 Human Geography |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health |
ISSN: |
0143-005X |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
29 June 2020 | Published | 24 April 2020 | Published Online | 31 March 2020 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111830 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2019-213591 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 28 Apr 2020.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |