SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Learning Together; part 2: training costs and health gain - a cost analysis.

Cullen, K; Riches, W; Macaulay, C; Spicer, J (2017) Learning Together; part 2: training costs and health gain - a cost analysis. Educ Prim Care, 28 (1). pp. 36-44. ISSN 1475-990X https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1261005
SGUL Authors: Spicer, John Edmund Andrew

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (152kB)

Abstract

Learning Together is a complex educational intervention aimed at improving health outcomes for children and young people. There is an additional cost as two doctors are seeing patients together for a longer appointment than a standard general practice (GP) appointment. Our approach combines the impact of the training clinics on activity in South London in 2014-15 with health gain, using NICE guidance and standards to allow comparison of training options. METHODS: Activity data was collected from Training Practices hosting Learning Together. A computer based model was developed to analyse the costs of the Learning Together intervention compared to usual training in a partial economic evaluation. The results of the model were used to value the health gain required to make the intervention cost effective. RESULTS: Data were returned for 363 patients booked into 61 clinics across 16 Training Practices. Learning Together clinics resulted in an increase in costs of £37 per clinic. Threshold analysis illustrated one child with a common illness like constipation needs to be well for two weeks, in one Practice hosting four training clinics for the clinics to be considered cost effective. CONCLUSION: Learning Together is of minimal training cost. Our threshold analysis produced a rubric that can be used locally to test cost effectiveness at a Practice or Programme level.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Education for Primary Care on 01/12/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14739879.2016.1261005.
Keywords: General practice, children, cost, health outcomes, learning together, paediatrics, Child, Constipation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, General Practitioners, Humans, Internship and Residency, Learning, Pediatricians, Referral and Consultation, Humans, Constipation, Learning, Internship and Residency, Child, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Referral and Consultation, General Practitioners, Pediatricians, General practice, paediatrics, learning together, children, health outcomes, cost, General practice, children, cost, health outcomes, learning together, paediatrics, Child, Constipation, Cost-Benefit Analysis, General Practitioners, Humans, Internship and Residency, Learning, Pediatricians, Referral and Consultation, Public Health, 1117 Public Health and Health Services
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Educ Prim Care
ISSN: 1475-990X
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
January 2017Published
1 December 2016Published Online
17 October 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 27905265
Web of Science ID: WOS:000441838300008
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111787
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1261005

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item