SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study.

Barrington, SF; Phillips, EH; Counsell, N; Hancock, B; Pettengell, R; Johnson, P; Townsend, W; Culligan, D; Popova, B; Clifton-Hadley, L; et al. Barrington, SF; Phillips, EH; Counsell, N; Hancock, B; Pettengell, R; Johnson, P; Townsend, W; Culligan, D; Popova, B; Clifton-Hadley, L; McMillan, A; Hoskin, P; O'Doherty, MJ; Illidge, T; Radford, J (2019) Positron Emission Tomography Score Has Greater Prognostic Significance Than Pretreatment Risk Stratification in Early-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma in the UK RAPID Study. J Clin Oncol, 37 (20). pp. 1732-1741. ISSN 1527-7755 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01799
SGUL Authors: Pettengell, Ruth

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (918kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate stratification of patients is an important goal in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), but the role of pretreatment clinical risk stratification in the context of positron emission tomography (PET) -adapted treatment is unclear. We performed a subsidiary analysis of the RAPID trial to assess the prognostic value of pretreatment risk factors and PET score in determining outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IA to IIA HL and no mediastinal bulk underwent PET assessment after three cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; 143 PET-positive patients (PET score, 3 to 5) received a fourth doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine cycle and involved-field radiotherapy, and 419 patients in complete metabolic remission were randomly assigned to receive involved-field radiotherapy (n = 208) or no additional treatment (n = 211). Cox regression was used to investigate the association between PET score and pretreatment risk factors with HL-specific event-free survival (EFS). RESULTS: High PET score was associated with inferior EFS, before (P < .001) and after adjustment (P = .01) for baseline risk stratification. Only patients with a postchemotherapy PET score of 5 (uptake ≥ three times maximum liver uptake) had an increased risk of progression or HL-related death (hazard ratio, 9.4 v score of 3; 95% CI, 2.8 to 31.3 and hazard ratio, 6.7 v score of 4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 31.7). Patients with a PET score of 5 also had inferior progression-free and overall survival. There was no association between European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer or German Hodgkin Study Group risk group and EFS, before or after adjusting for PET score (all P > .4). CONCLUSION: In RAPID, a positive PET scan did not carry uniform prognostic weight; only a PET score of 5 was associated with inferior outcomes. This suggests that in future trials involving patients without B symptoms or mediastinal bulk, a score of 5 rather than a positive PET result should be used to guide treatment escalation in early-stage HL.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Keywords: 1112 Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: J Clin Oncol
ISSN: 1527-7755
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
10 July 2019Published
21 May 2019Published Online
5 April 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
0220BloodwiseUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDLymphona Research TrustUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDTeenage Cancer TrustUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDDepartment of Healthhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000276
RP-2-16-07-001National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
UNSPECIFIEDCancer Research UKhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289
UNSPECIFIEDEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
UNSPECIFIEDMedical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
PubMed ID: 31112475
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111687
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.01799

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item