Mezey, G; White, S; Harrison, I; Bousfield, J; Lloyd-Evans, B; Payne, S; Killaspy, H
(2020)
Validity, reliability, acceptability, and utility of the Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE): a clinical tool to facilitate social inclusion amongst people with severe mental health problems.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol, 55 (7).
pp. 953-964.
ISSN 1433-9285
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01826-3
SGUL Authors: Mezey, Gillian Clare White, Sarah Jane Mezey, Gillian Clare
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals with severe mental health problems are at risk of social exclusion, which may complicate their recovery. Mental health and social care staff have, until now, had no valid or reliable way of assessing their clients' social inclusion. The Social Inclusion Questionnaire User Experience (SInQUE) was developed to address this. It assesses five domains: social integration; productivity; consumption; access to services; and political engagement, in the year prior to first psychiatric admission (T1) and the year prior to interview (T2) from which a total score at each time point can be calculated. AIMS: To establish the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the SInQUE in individuals with a broad range of psychiatric diagnoses receiving care from community mental health services and its utility for mental health staff. METHOD: Participants were 192 mental health service users with psychosis, personality disorder, or common mental disorder (e.g., depression, anxiety) who completed the SInQUE alongside other validated outcome measures. Test-retest reliability was assessed in a sub-sample of 30 participants and inter-rater reliability was assessed in 11 participants. SInQUE ratings of 28 participants were compared with those of a sibling with no experience of mental illness to account for shared socio-cultural factors. Acceptability and utility of the tool were assessed using completion rates and focus groups with staff. RESULTS: The SInQUE demonstrated acceptable convergent validity. The total score and the Social Integration domain score were strongly correlated with quality of life, both in the full sample and in the three diagnostic groups. Discriminant validity and test-retest reliability were established across all domains, although the test-retest reliability on scores for the Service Access and Political Engagement domains prior to first admission to hospital (T1) was lower than other domains. Inter-rater reliability was excellent for all domains at T1 and T2. CONCLUSIONS: The component of the SInQUE that assesses current social inclusion has good psychometric properties and can be recommended for use by mental health staff.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© The Author(s) 2020
Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
Keywords: |
Personality disorder, Psychometrics, Psychosis, Social inclusion, common mental disorder, mental illness, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1702 Cognitive Sciences, 1701 Psychology, Psychiatry |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol |
ISSN: |
1433-9285 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
July 2020 | Published | 3 February 2020 | Published Online | 24 December 2019 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
Projects: |
Project ID | Funder | Funder ID |
---|
C088/T14-035/SGGM-P68 | School for Social Care Research | UNSPECIFIED |
|
PubMed ID: |
32016512 |
![](http://static.pubmed.gov/portal/portal3rc.fcgi/2745237/img/27842) |
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111638 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01826-3 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 07 Feb 2020.
Actions (login required)
![Edit Item](/style/images/action_view.png) |
Edit Item |