Miles, A; Bhatnagar, G; Halligan, S; Gupta, A; Tolan, D; Zealley, I; Taylor, SA; METRIC investigators
(2019)
Magnetic resonance enterography, small bowel ultrasound and colonoscopy to diagnose and stage Crohn's disease: patient acceptability and perceived burden.
Eur Radiol, 29 (3).
pp. 1083-1093.
ISSN 1432-1084
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5661-2
SGUL Authors: Pollok, Richard Charles G
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare patient acceptability and burden of magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) and ultrasound (US) to each other, and to other enteric investigations, particularly colonoscopy. METHODS: 159 patients (mean age 38, 94 female) with newly diagnosed or relapsing Crohn's disease, prospectively recruited to a multicentre diagnostic accuracy study comparing MRE and US completed an experience questionnaire on the burden and acceptability of small bowel investigations between December 2013 and September 2016. Acceptability, recovery time, scan burden and willingness to repeat the test were analysed using the Wilcoxon signed rank and McNemar tests; and group differences in scan burden with Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. RESULTS: Overall, 128 (88%) patients rated MRE as very or fairly acceptable, lower than US (144, 99%; p < 0.001), but greater than colonoscopy (60, 60%; p < 0.001). MRE recovery time was longer than US (p < 0.001), but shorter than colonoscopy (p < 0.001). Patients were less willing to undergo MRE again than US (127 vs. 133, 91% vs. 99%; p = 0.012), but more willing than for colonoscopy (68, 75%; p = 0.017). MRE generated greater burden than US (p < 0.001), although burden scores were low. Younger age and emotional distress were associated with greater MRE and US burden. Higher MRE discomfort was associated with patient preference for US (p = 0.053). Patients rated test accuracy as more important than scan discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: MRE and US are well tolerated. Although MRE generates greater burden, longer recovery and is less preferred than US, it is more acceptable than colonoscopy. Patients, however, place greater emphasis on diagnostic accuracy than burden. KEY POINTS: • MRE and US are rated as acceptable by most patients and superior to colonoscopy. • MRE generates significantly greater burden and longer recovery times than US, particularly in younger patients and those with high levels of emotional distress. • Most patients prefer the experience of undergoing US than MRE; however, patients rate test accuracy as more importance than scan burden.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© The Author(s) 2018
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
Keywords: |
Crohn disease, Magnetic resonance imaging, Patient preference, Patient satisfaction, Ultrasound, Adolescent, Adult, Colonoscopy, Crohn Disease, Female, Humans, Intestine, Small, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Recurrence, Reproducibility of Results, Severity of Illness Index, Ultrasonography, METRIC investigators, Intestine, Small, Humans, Crohn Disease, Recurrence, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography, Colonoscopy, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Adolescent, Adult, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Female, Male, Magnetic resonance imaging, Ultrasound, Crohn disease, Patient preference, Patient satisfaction, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Eur Radiol |
ISSN: |
1432-1084 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
March 2019 | Published | 20 August 2018 | Published Online | 12 July 2018 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
PubMed ID: |
30128615 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000457396100003 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/111606 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5661-2 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 27 Jan 2020.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |