SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Outcome of isolated fetal talipes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Di Mascio, D; Buca, D; Khalil, A; Rizzo, G; Makatsariya, A; Sileo, F; Liberati, M; Benedetti Panici, P; Acharya, G; D'Antonio, F (2019) Outcome of isolated fetal talipes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 98 (11). pp. 1367-1377. ISSN 1600-0412 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13637
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (544kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this systematic review was to explore the outcome of fetuses with a prenatal diagnosis of isolated talipes. Material and methods Medline, Embase, Cinahl, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were searched. The outcomes explored were: associated anomalies detected at follow‐up ultrasound examination; fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and birth; chromosomal abnormalities detected with standard and chromosomal microarray analysis, intrauterine, neonatal, and perinatal death, and termination of pregnancy; rate of surgical and nonsurgical treatment; neurodevelopmental outcome; and false‐positive rate of prenatal diagnosis. Meta‐analyses of proportions were used to combine data. Results Twenty‐five studies (1567 fetuses) were included. Associated anomalies were detected in 7.8% (95% CI 0.1%‐29.3%) of cases at follow‐up ultrasound, and in 4.0% (95% CI 0.1%‐13.2%) of cases, fetal MRI identified anomalies not detected at ultrasound assessment. Similarly, 7.0% (95% CI 3.4%‐11.7%) of cases labeled as isolated talipes on prenatal imaging were found to have associated anomalies at birth. Abnormal karyotype was present in 3.6% (95% CI 1.7%‐6.2%) of fetuses, whereas no anomaly was found at chromosomal microarray analysis, although this outcome was reported by only 1 study. Intrauterine death occurred in 0.99% (95% CI 0.4%‐1.9%) of fetuses, whereas the corresponding figures for neonatal death and termination of pregnancy were 1.5% (95% CI 0.6%‐2.6%) and 2.2% (95% CI 1.2%‐3.4%), respectively. Surgical management of anomalies after birth was found in 41.7% (95% CI 27.0%‐57.2%) of fetuses with isolated talipes, and 54.8% (95% CI 31.5%‐77.0%) had nonsurgical management of the anomalies after birth. Abnormal neurodevelopmental outcome was reported in 7.6% (95% CI 1.0%‐19.4%) of children, although this analysis was affected by the small number of included cases and short time of follow up. Conclusions Isolated talipes detected on prenatal ultrasound carries a generally good prognosis. The incidence of additional abnormalities detected on fetal MRI, aneuploidy, or neurodevelopmental disability is relatively low. However, longitudinal ultrasound assessment during pregnancy and a thorough postnatal evaluation are recommended to rule out associated anomalies that may significantly impact short‐ and long‐term prognosis.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Di Mascio, D, Buca, D, Khalil, A, et al. Outcome of isolated fetal talipes: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98: 1367‐ 1377, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13637. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: Clubfoot, fetal MRI, karyotype, talipes equinovarus ultrasound, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine, 1117 Public Health And Health Services, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
ISSN: 1600-0412
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 October 2019Published
6 June 2019Published Online
16 April 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 31034582
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/110849
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13637

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item