SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Uninterrupted edoxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for ablation of atrial fibrillation: the ELIMINATE-AF trial.

Hohnloser, SH; Camm, J; Cappato, R; Diener, H-C; Heidbüchel, H; Mont, L; Morillo, CA; Abozguia, K; Grimaldi, M; Rauer, H; et al. Hohnloser, SH; Camm, J; Cappato, R; Diener, H-C; Heidbüchel, H; Mont, L; Morillo, CA; Abozguia, K; Grimaldi, M; Rauer, H; Reimitz, P-E; Smolnik, R; Mönninghoff, C; Kautzner, J (2019) Uninterrupted edoxaban vs. vitamin K antagonists for ablation of atrial fibrillation: the ELIMINATE-AF trial. Eur Heart J, 40 (36). pp. 3013-3021. ISSN 1522-9645 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz190
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (405kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS: Edoxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor approved for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Uninterrupted edoxaban therapy in patients undergoing AF ablation has not been tested. METHODS AND RESULTS: The ELIMINATE-AF trial, a multinational, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study, was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of once-daily edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for dose reduction) vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in AF patients undergoing catheter ablation. Patients were randomized 2:1 to edoxaban vs. VKA. The primary endpoint (per-protocol population) was time to first occurrence of all-cause death, stroke, or International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis-defined major bleeding during the period from the end of the ablation procedure to end of treatment (90 days). Overall, 632 patients were enrolled, 614 randomized, and 553 received study drug and underwent ablation; 177 subjects underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging to assess silent cerebral infarcts. The primary endpoint (only major bleeds occurred) was observed in 0.3% (1 patient) on edoxaban and 2.0% (2 patients) on VKA [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.16 (0.02-1.73)]. In the ablation population (modified intent-to-treat population including patients with ablation), the primary endpoint was observed in 2.7% of edoxaban (N = 10) and 1.7% of VKA patients (N = 3) between start of ablation and end of treatment. There were one ischaemic and one haemorrhagic stroke, both in patients on edoxaban. Cerebral microemboli were detected in 13.8% (16) patients who received edoxaban and 9.6% (5) patients in the VKA group (nominal P = 0.62). CONCLUSION: Uninterrupted edoxaban therapy represents an alternative to uninterrupted VKA treatment in patients undergoing AF ablation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
Keywords: Ablation, Anticoagulation, Atrial fibrillation, Bleeding events, Stroke, 1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Eur Heart J
ISSN: 1522-9645
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
21 September 2019Published
11 April 2019Published Online
25 March 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 30976787
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/110820
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz190

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item