SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Di Mascio, D; Acharya, G; Khalil, A; Odibo, A; Prefumo, F; Liberati, M; Buca, D; Manzoli, L; Flacco, ME; Brunelli, R; et al. Di Mascio, D; Acharya, G; Khalil, A; Odibo, A; Prefumo, F; Liberati, M; Buca, D; Manzoli, L; Flacco, ME; Brunelli, R; Benedetti Panici, P; D'Antonio, F (2019) Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 98 (10). pp. 1245-1257. ISSN 1600-0412 https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13613
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this systematic review was to quantify the association between birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. Material and methods MEDLINE, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched. Studies reporting the occurrence of morbidity in twins affected compared with those not affected by birthweight discordance were included. The primary outcome was composite neonatal morbidity (including neurological, respiratory, infectious morbidities, abnormal acid‐base status and necrotizing enterocolitis). The secondary outcomes were the individual morbidities. Sub‐group analysis according to chorionicity, gestational age at birth and fetal weight (smaller vs larger twin) was also performed. Random‐effect head‐to‐head meta‐analyses were used to analyze the data. Results Twenty studies (10 851 twin pregnancies) were included. The risk of composite morbidity was significantly higher in the pregnancies with birthweight discordance ≥15% (odds ratio [OR] 1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0‐1.9), ≥20% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.40‐3.45), ≥25% (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.8‐3.6), and ≥30% (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.2‐3.2). In dichorionic twins, birthweight discordance ≥15% (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.65‐3.46), ≥20% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3‐3.8), ≥25% (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4‐5.1) and ≥30% (OR 3.6, 95% CI 2.3‐5.7) were all significantly associated with composite neonatal morbidity. Analysis of monochorionic twins was hampered by the very small number of included studies, which precluded adequate statistical power. Monochorionic twins with a birthweight discordance ≥20% were at significantly higher risk of composite neonatal morbidity (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1‐4.9) compared with those presenting with lesser degree of discordance. When stratifying the analysis according to gestational age at birth and fetal size, twins with birthweight discordance ≥15%, 20%, 25% and 30% delivered at ≥34 weeks were at higher risk of neonatal morbidity compared with controls, but there was no difference in the risk of morbidity between the larger and the smaller twin in the discordant pair. Conclusions Birthweight discordance is associated with neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies. The strength of this association persists for dichorionic twins. It was not possible to extrapolate robust evidence on monochorionic twins due to the low power of the analysis due to the small number of included studies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Di Mascio, D, Acharya, G, Khalil, A, et al. Birthweight discordance and neonatal morbidity in twin pregnancies: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019; 98: 1245‐ 1257, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13613. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: birthweight discordance, dichorionic twins, monochorionic twins, neonatal morbidity, twin pregnancies, ultrasound, 1114 Paediatrics And Reproductive Medicine, 1117 Public Health And Health Services, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
ISSN: 1600-0412
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
20 September 2019Published
23 May 2019Published Online
18 March 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
PubMed ID: 30903624
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/110816
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13613

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item