SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population.

von Niederhäusern, B; Saccilotto, R; Schädelin, S; Ziesenitz, V; Benkert, P; Decker, M-L; Hammann, A; Bielicki, J; Pfister, M; Pauli-Magnus, C (2017) Validity of mobile electronic data capture in clinical studies: a pilot study in a pediatric population. BMC Med Res Methodol, 17 (1). p. 163. ISSN 1471-2288 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x
SGUL Authors: Bielicki, Julia Anna

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (653kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical studies in children are necessary yet conducting multiple visits at study centers remains challenging. The success of "care-at-home" initiatives and remote clinical trials suggests their potential to facilitate conduct of pediatric studies. This pilot aimed to study the feasibility of remotely collecting valid (i.e. complete and correct) saliva samples and clinical data utilizing mobile technology. METHODS: Single-center, prospective pilot study in children undergoing elective tonsillectomy at the University of Basel Children's Hospital. Data on pain scores and concomitant medication and saliva samples were collected by caregivers on two to four inpatient study days and on three consecutive study days at home. A tailored mobile application developed for this study supported data collection. The primary endpoint was the proportion of complete and correct caregiver-collected data (pain scale) and saliva samples in the at-home setting. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of complete and correct saliva samples in the inpatient setting, subjective feasibility for caregivers, and study cost. RESULTS: A total number of 23 children were included in the study of which 17 children, median age 6.0 years (IQR 5.0, 7.4), completed the study. During the at-home phase, 71.9% [CI = 64.4, 78.6] of all caregiver-collected pain assessments and 53.9% [CI = 44.2, 63.4] of all saliva samples were complete and correct. Overall, 64.7% [CI = 58.7, 70.4] of all data collected by caregivers at home was complete and correct. The predominant reason for incorrectness of data was adherence to the timing of predefined patient actions. Participating caregivers reported high levels of satisfaction and willingness to participate in similar trials in the future. Study costs for a potential sample size of 100 patients were calculated to be 20% lower for the at-home than for a traditional in-patient study setting. CONCLUSIONS: Mobile device supported studies conducted at home may provide a cost-effective approach to facilitate conduct of clinical studies in children. Given findings in this pilot study, data collection at home may focus on electronic data capture rather than biological sampling.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Keywords: Data quality, Data validity, Feasibility, Mobile studies, Pediatrics, Remote studies, General & Internal Medicine, 1117 Public Health And Health Services
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Med Res Methodol
ISSN: 1471-2288
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
8 December 2017Published
22 November 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 29216831
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109885
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0438-x

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item