Drennan, VM; Halter, M; Joly, L; Gage, H; Grant, RL; Gabe, J; Brearley, S; Carneiro, W; de Lusignan, S
(2015)
Physician associates and GPs in primary care: a comparison.
Br J Gen Pract, 65 (634).
e344-e350.
ISSN 1478-5242
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X684877
SGUL Authors: Drennan, Vari MacDougal
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physician associates [PAs] (also known as physician assistants) are new to the NHS and there is little evidence concerning their contribution in general practice. AIM: This study aimed to compare outcomes and costs of same-day requested consultations by PAs with those of GPs. DESIGN AND SETTING: An observational study of 2086 patient records presenting at same-day appointments in 12 general practices in England. METHOD: PA consultations were compared with those of GPs. Primary outcome was re-consultation within 14 days for the same or linked problem. Secondary outcomes were processes of care. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the rates of re-consultation (rate ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.86 to 1.79, P = 0.25). There were no differences in rates of diagnostic tests ordered (1.08, 95% CI = 0.89 to 1.30, P = 0.44), referrals (0.95, 95% CI = 0.63 to 1.43, P = 0.80), prescriptions issued (1.16, 95% CI = 0.87 to 1.53, P = 0.31), or patient satisfaction (1.00, 95% CI = 0.42 to 2.36, P = 0.99). Records of initial consultations of 79.2% (n = 145) of PAs and 48.3% (n = 99) of GPs were judged appropriate by independent GPs (P<0.001). The adjusted average PA consultation was 5.8 minutes longer than the GP consultation (95% CI = 2.46 to 7.1; P<0.001); cost per consultation was GBP £6.22, (US$ 10.15) lower (95% CI = -7.61 to -2.46, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The processes and outcomes of PA and GP consultations for same-day appointment patients are similar at a lower consultation cost. PAs offer a potentially acceptable and efficient addition to the general practice workforce.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© British Journal of General Practice 2015 This is an OpenAccess article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Keywords: |
general practitioners, observational study, physician assistants, physicians, family, primary health care, Adult, Appointments and Schedules, England, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Satisfaction, Physician Assistants, Primary Health Care, Retrospective Studies, State Medicine, Humans, Retrospective Studies, Adult, Physician Assistants, State Medicine, Appointments and Schedules, Patient Satisfaction, Primary Health Care, England, Female, Male, general practitioners, observational study, physician assistants, physicians, family, primary health care, Public Health, 1117 Public Health And Health Services |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Br J Gen Pract |
ISSN: |
1478-5242 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
May 2015 | Published | 27 April 2015 | Published Online | 5 January 2015 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 |
Projects: |
Project ID | Funder | Funder ID |
---|
09/1801/1066 | Department of Health | UNSPECIFIED |
|
PubMed ID: |
25918339 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000356966300008 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109439 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X684877 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 10 Jan 2018.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |