SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Did the accuracy of oral amoxicillin dosing of children improve after British National Formulary dose revisions in 2014? National cross-sectional survey in England.

Rann, O; Sharland, M; Long, P; Wong, ICK; Laverty, AA; Bottle, A; Barker, CI; Bielicki, J; Saxena, S (2017) Did the accuracy of oral amoxicillin dosing of children improve after British National Formulary dose revisions in 2014? National cross-sectional survey in England. BMJ Open, 7 (9). ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016363
SGUL Authors: Barker, Charlotte Ida Sophia

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (489kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inaccurate antibiotic dosing can lead to treatment failure, fuel antimicrobial resistance and increase side effects. The British National Formulary for Children (BNFC) guidance recommends oral antibiotic dosing according to age bands as a proxy for weight. Recommended doses of amoxicillin for children were increased in 2014 'after widespread concerns of under dosing'. However, the impact of dose changes on British children of different weights is unknown, particularly given the rising prevalence of childhood obesity in the UK. We aimed to estimate the accuracy of oral amoxicillin dosing in British children before and after the revised BNFC guidance in 2014. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We used data on age and weights for 1556 British children (aged 2-18 years) from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, the Health Survey for England 2013. INTERVENTIONS: We calculated the doses each child would receive using the BNFC age band guidance, before and after the 2014 changes, against the 'gold standard' weight-based dose of amoxicillin, as per its summary of product characteristics. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Assuming children of different weights were equally likely to receive antibiotics, we calculated the percentage of the children who would be at risk of misdosing by the BNFC age bands. RESULTS: Before 2014, 54.6% of children receiving oral amoxicillin would have been underdosed and no child would have received more than the recommended dose. After the BNFC guidance changed in 2014, the number of children estimated as underdosed dropped to 5.8%, but 0.5% of the children would have received too high a dose. CONCLUSIONS: Changes to the BNFC age-banded amoxicillin doses in 2014 have significantly reduced the proportion of children who are likely to be underdosed, with only a minimal rise in the number of those above the recommended range.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Keywords: Age bands, Amoxicillin, Antibiotic Dosing, British National Formulary, Children, Oral Penicillin
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
Article Number: e016363
ISSN: 2044-6055
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
27 September 2017Published
1 September 2017Published Online
27 July 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
261060Seventh Framework Programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004963
PubMed ID: 28954790
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109183
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016363

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item