Rücker, G; Cates, CJ; Schwarzer, G
(2017)
Methods for including information from multi-arm trials in pairwise meta-analysis.
Res Synth Methods, 8 (4).
pp. 392-403.
ISSN 1759-2887
https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1259
SGUL Authors: Cates, Christopher Joseph
|
PDF
Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined]. Download (179kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Systematic reviewers conducting pairwise meta-analyses sometimes encounter multi-arm studies. To include these studies, in order to avoid a unit-of-analysis error, often two or more arms are combined or the control arm is split up. In this tutorial we present five different approaches that can be used. Particularly, we present a novel approach (Method 4) that to the best of our knowledge has not been presented before. We demonstrate their application on three selected data sets, discuss their scope of application and their advantages and limitations, and give recommendations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Rücker G, Cates CJ, Schwarzer G. Methods for including information from multi-arm trials in pairwise meta-analysis. Res Syn Meth. 2017;8:392–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1259. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving. |
Keywords: | Pairwise meta-analysis, multi-arm trials, multiplicity, network meta-analysis |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: | Res Synth Methods |
ISSN: | 1759-2887 |
Language: | eng |
Publisher License: | Publisher's own licence |
PubMed ID: | 28759708 |
Go to PubMed abstract | |
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/109049 |
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1259 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |