SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sin, J; Gillard, S; Spain, D; Cornelius, V; Chen, T; Henderson, C (2017) Effectiveness of psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev, 56. pp. 13-24. ISSN 1873-7811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.002
SGUL Authors: Gillard, Steven George Sin, Pui Han Jacqueline

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (697kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (451kB) | Preview

Abstract

Psychoeducational interventions for family carers of people with psychosis are effective for improving compliance and preventing relapse. Whether carers benefit from these interventions has been little explored. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of psychoeducation for improving carers' outcomes, and potential treatment moderators. We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in English or Chinese in eight databases. Carers' outcomes included wellbeing, quality of life, global morbidities, burden, and expressed emotion. Thirty-two RCTs were included, examining 2858 carers. Intervention duration ranged from 4 to 52weeks, and contact times ranged from 6 to 42hours. At post intervention, findings were equivocal for carers' wellbeing (SMD 0.103, 95% CI -0.186 to 0.392). Conversely, psychoeducation was superior in reducing carers' global morbidities (SMD -0.230, 95% CI -0.386 to -0.075), perceived burden (SMD -0.434, 95% CI -0.567 to -0.31), negative caregiving experiences (SMD -0.210, 95% CI -0.396 to -0.025) and expressed emotion (SMD -0.161, 95% CI -0.367 to -0.045). The lack of available data precluded meta-analysis of outcomes beyond short-term follow-up. Meta-regression revealed no significant associations between intervention modality, duration, or contact time and outcomes. Further research should focus on improving carers' outcomes in the longer-term and identifying factors to optimise intervention design.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).
Keywords: Carers, Family, Informal caring/caregiving, Psychoeducation, Psychosis, Systematic review, 1701 Psychology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Psychol Rev
ISSN: 1873-7811
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
August 2017Published
29 May 2017Published Online
23 May 2017Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PDF-2015-08-035National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 28578249
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/108870
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.05.002

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item