SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Factors associated with study attrition in a pilot randomised controlled trial to explore the role of exercise-assisted reduction to stop (EARS) smoking in disadvantaged groups.

Thompson, TP; Greaves, CJ; Ayres, R; Aveyard, P; Warren, FC; Byng, R; Taylor, RS; Campbell, JL; Ussher, M; Michie, S; et al. Thompson, TP; Greaves, CJ; Ayres, R; Aveyard, P; Warren, FC; Byng, R; Taylor, RS; Campbell, JL; Ussher, M; Michie, S; West, R; Taylor, AH (2016) Factors associated with study attrition in a pilot randomised controlled trial to explore the role of exercise-assisted reduction to stop (EARS) smoking in disadvantaged groups. Trials, 17 (1). p. 524. ISSN 1745-6215 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1641-5
SGUL Authors: Ussher, Michael Henry

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (432kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Study attrition has the potential to compromise a trial's internal and external validity. The aim of the present study was to identify factors associated with participant attrition in a pilot trial of the effectiveness of a novel behavioural support intervention focused on increasing physical activity to reduce smoking, to inform the methods to reduce attrition in a definitive trial. METHODS: Disadvantaged smokers who wanted to reduce but not quit were randomised (N = 99), of whom 61 (62 %) completed follow-up assessments at 16 weeks. Univariable logistic regression was conducted to determine the effects of intervention arm, method of recruitment, and participant characteristics (sociodemographic factors, and lifestyle, behavioural and attitudinal characteristics) on attrition, followed by multivariable logistic regression on those factors found to be related to attrition. RESULTS: Participants with low confidence to quit, and who were undertaking less than 150 mins of moderate and vigorous physical activity per week at baseline were less likely to complete the 16-week follow-up assessment. Exploratory analysis revealed that those who were lost to follow-up early in the trial (i.e., by 4 weeks), compared with those completing the study, were younger, had smoked for fewer years and had lower confidence to quit in the next 6 months. Participants who recorded a higher expired air carbon monoxide reading at baseline were more likely to drop out late in the study, as were those recruited via follow-up telephone calls. Multivariable analyses showed that only completing less than 150 mins of physical activity retained any confidence in predicting attrition in the presence of other variables. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that those who take more effort to be recruited, are younger, are heavier smokers, have less confidence to quit, and are less physically active are more likely to withdraw or be lost to follow-up.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s). 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Keywords: Drop out, Harm reduction, Physical activity, Retention, Smoking reduction, Drop out, Harm reduction, Physical activity, Retention, Smoking reduction, General & Internal Medicine, 1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Language: ENG
Dates:
DateEvent
27 October 2016Published
6 October 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
07/78/02National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 27788686
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/108439
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1641-5

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item