SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The blp locus of Streptococcus pneumoniae plays a limited role in the selection of which strains can co-colonize the human nasopharynx.

Valente, C; Dawid, S; Pinto, FR; Hinds, J; Simões, AS; Gould, KA; Mendes, LA; de Lencastre, H; Sá-Leão, R (2016) The blp locus of Streptococcus pneumoniae plays a limited role in the selection of which strains can co-colonize the human nasopharynx. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 82 (17). pp. 5206-5215. ISSN 1098-5336 https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01048-16
SGUL Authors: Hinds, Jason

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal colonization is important for Streptococcus pneumoniae evolution, providing the opportunity for horizontal gene transfer when multiple strains co-occur. Although colonization with more than one strain of pneumococcus is common, the factors that influence the ability of strains to co-exist are not known. A highly variable blp (bacteriocin-like peptide) locus has been identified in all sequenced strains of S. pneumoniae This locus controls the regulation and secretion of bacteriocins, small peptides that target other bacteria. In this study, we analyzed a series of co-colonizing isolates to evaluate the impact of the blp locus on human colonization to determine whether competitive phenotypes of bacteriocin secretion restrict co-colonization.We identified a collection of 135 nasopharyngeal samples with two or more strains totaling 285 isolates. The blp locus of all strains was characterized genetically with regards to pheromone type, bacteriocin/immunity content and potential for locus functionality. Inhibitory phenotypes of bacteriocin secretion and locus activity were assessed through overlay assays. Isolates from single colonization (n=298) were characterized for comparison.Co-colonizing strains had a high diversity of blp cassettes; approximately one third displayed an inhibitory phenotype in vitro Despite in vitro evidence of competition, pneumococci co-colonized individuals independently of their blp pheromone type (p=0.577), bacteriocin/immunity content, blp locus activity (p=0.798) and inhibitory phenotype (p=0.716). In addition, no significant differences were observed when single and co-colonizing strains were compared.Despite clear evidence of blp-mediated competition in experimental models, our study suggests that the blp locus plays a limited role in restricting pneumococcal co-colonization in humans. IMPORTANCE: Nasopharyngeal colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) is important for pneumococcal evolution as it represents the major site for horizontal gene transfer when multiple strains co-occur, a phenomenon known as co-colonization. Understanding how pneumococcal strains interact within the competitive environment of the nasopharynx is of chief importance in the context of pneumococcal ecology. In this study we used an unbiased collection of naturally co-occurring pneumococcal strains and showed that a biological process frequently used by bacteria for competition - bacteriocin production - is not decisive in the co-existence of pneumococci in the host, contrary to what has been shown in experimental models.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016, American Society for Microbiology
Keywords: Microbiology, MD Multidisciplinary
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Applied and Environmental Microbiology
ISSN: 1098-5336
Language: ENG
Dates:
DateEvent
17 June 2016Published Online
11 June 2016Accepted
1 September 2016Published
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PTDC/SAU-ESA/65048/2006Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
PTDC/BIA-BEC/098289/2008Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
SFRH/BD/70058/2010Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
UID/CBQ/04612/201Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001871
PubMed ID: 27316956
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107987
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01048-16

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item