SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Implementation and Operational Research: Evaluation of a Public-Sector, Provider-Initiated Cryptococcal Antigen Screening and Treatment Program, Western Cape, South Africa.

Vallabhaneni, S; Longley, N; Smith, M; Smith, R; Osler, M; Kelly, N; Cross, A; Boulle, A; Meintjes, G; Govender, NP (2016) Implementation and Operational Research: Evaluation of a Public-Sector, Provider-Initiated Cryptococcal Antigen Screening and Treatment Program, Western Cape, South Africa. JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 72 (2). e37-e42. ISSN 1525-4135 https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000976
SGUL Authors: Longley, Nicola

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (223kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Screening for serum cryptococcal antigen (CrAg) may identify those at risk for disseminated cryptococcal disease (DCD), and preemptive fluconazole treatment may prevent progression to DCD. In August 2012, the Western Cape Province (WC), South Africa, adopted provider-initiated CrAg screening. We evaluated the implementation and effectiveness of this large-scale public-sector program during its first year, September 1, 2012-August 31, 2013. METHODS: We used data from the South African National Health Laboratory Service, WC provincial HIV program, and nationwide surveillance data for DCD. We assessed the proportion of eligible patients screened for CrAg (CrAg test done within 30 days of CD4 date) and the prevalence of CrAg positivity. Incidence of DCD among those screened was compared with those not screened. RESULTS: Of 4395 eligible patients, 26.6% (n = 1170) were screened. The proportion of patients screened increased from 15.9% in September 2012 to 36.6% in August 2013. The prevalence of positive serum CrAg was 2.1%. Treatment data were available for 13 of 24 CrAg-positive patients; 9 of 13 were treated with fluconazole. Nine (0.8%) incident cases of DCD occurred among the 1170 patients who were screened for CrAg vs. 49 (1.5%) incident cases among the 3225 patients not screened (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Relatively few eligible patients were screened under the WC provider-initiated CrAg screening program. Unscreened patients were nearly twice as likely to develop DCD. CrAg screening can reduce the burden of DCD, but needs to be implemented well. To improve screening rates, countries should consider laboratory-based reflexive screening when possible.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC), which permits downloading, sharing, and reproducing the work in any medium, provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially.
Keywords: Virology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
ISSN: 1525-4135
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 June 2016Published
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
098316Wellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
PubMed ID: 26926942
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107941
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000976

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item