SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Design of new patient-reported outcome measures to assess quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Peach, G; Romaine, J; Wilson, A; Holt, PJE; Thompson, MM; Hinchliffe, RJ; Bradley, C (2016) Design of new patient-reported outcome measures to assess quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 103 (8). pp. 1003-1011. ISSN 1365-2168 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10181
SGUL Authors: Holt, Peter James Edward Thompson, Matthew Merfyn

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (4MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No condition-specific patient-reported outcome measures exist for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The aim of this work was to develop three questionnaires to assess quality of life (QoL), symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with AAA. METHODS: Semistructured interview techniques were used to explore patients' experiences of having an AAA in a series of focus groups and in-depth interviews. The information gathered was used to inform design and selection of items for the new tools; the overall structure of the new questionnaires was based on tools developed previously for patients with diabetes and other conditions. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (51 men, 3 women; mean age 71·9 years) were recruited from four NHS Trusts to participate in focus groups or interviews, either while under surveillance, or following AAA repair (using open or endovascular techniques). The Aneurysm-Dependent Quality of Life Questionnaire (AneurysmDQoL) is an individualized measure of the impact of AAA on patients' QoL. Twenty-three domains were chosen specifically for their relevance to patients with AAA, with a further two overview items to assess overall QoL and the impact of AAA on QoL. The Aneurysm Symptom Rating Questionnaire (AneurysmSRQ) is a 44-item measure assessing physical and psychological symptoms reported by patients with AAA. The Aneurysm Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (AneurysmTSQ) contains 11 items, suitable for patients before and after surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: The iterative development process reported here has confirmed that these three new tools have good face and content validity for patients with AAA.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Peach, G., Romaine, J., Wilson, A., Holt, P. J. E., Thompson, M. M., Hinchliffe, R. J. and Bradley, C. (2016), Design of new patient-reported outcome measures to assess quality of life, symptoms and treatment satisfaction in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 103: 1003–1011, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10181. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.
Keywords: Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Female, Focus Groups, Humans, Male, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, Patient Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Surgery, 11 Medical And Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Vascular & Cardiac Surgery (INCCVC)
Journal or Publication Title: Br J Surg
ISSN: 1365-2168
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 June 2016Published
23 May 2016Published Online
2 March 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PG/13/98/30490British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
NIHR-CS-011-008Department of HealthUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 27214517
Web of Science ID: WOS:000380175500010
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107936
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10181

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item