SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings.

Normansell, R; Holmes, R; Victor, C; Cook, DG; Kerry, S; Iliffe, S; Ussher, M; Fox-Rushby, J; Whincup, P; Harris, T (2016) Exploring non-participation in primary care physical activity interventions: PACE-UP trial interview findings. Trials, 17. p. 178. ISSN 1745-6215 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z
SGUL Authors: Cook, Derek Gordon Harris, Teresa Jane Ussher, Michael Henry Whincup, Peter Hynes Normansell, Rebecca Alice

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (597kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (70kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trials in primary care to increase physical activity (PA) typically experience poor recruitment rates and may not recruit those with lower PA levels and who are most in need of the intervention. Despite the well-publicised benefits of physical activity, the majority of adults in the UK remain inactive and, therefore, at greater risk of many health problems. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for non-participation in the PACE-UP trial, which is a primary care pedometer-based walking intervention. This is important for successful recruitment and retention in future PA trials and programmes. METHOD: We conducted semi-structured audio-recorded telephone interviews with 30 participants, aged 45-75 years, purposively sampled from those declining participation in the PACE-UP trial. Recruitment continued until data saturation and a demographically balanced sample was achieved. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded and subjected to thematic analysis. RESULTS: Interviewees supported walking as suitable exercise for most people in this age group, recognised the importance of this type of research and general practice as an appropriate setting. Key reasons for declining were: the perception of being already 'too active'; existing medical conditions; work; travel and other commitments. Less frequently cited reasons included reluctance to be randomised, the intervention's duration, wearing a pedometer, perceived inappropriateness of trial literature and a preference for a different kind of PA or for a group activity. CONCLUSIONS: Whilst most interviewees perceived themselves to be sufficiently active, an important minority did not participate due to existing medical conditions and other commitments. Recruitment to future PA trials might be improved by tailoring activity to compensate for medical problems, and adapting PA interventions to fit around work and travel commitments. Ensuring that patient-targeted literature is succinct and inclusive and that equipment is user-friendly are also important. Primary care is seen as an appropriate setting for PA trials and programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN98538934 .

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2016 Normansell et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Keywords: Exercise, Non-participation, Primary Health Care, Qualitative, Randomised controlled trial, Walking, Actigraphy, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Exercise, Exercise Therapy, Female, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Selection, Perception, Primary Health Care, Qualitative Research, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Research Subjects, United Kingdom, Walking, Primary Health Care, Exercise, Walking, Non, participation, Qualitative, Randomised controlled trial, General & Internal Medicine, 1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 April 2016Published
17 March 2016Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
HTA 10/32/02 ISRCTN42122561National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 27039181
Web of Science ID: WOS:000373488100001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107759
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1299-z

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item