SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Renal artery sympathetic denervation: observations from the UK experience.

Sharp, AS; Davies, JE; Lobo, MD; Bent, CL; Mark, PB; Burchell, AE; Thackray, SD; Martin, U; McKane, WS; Gerber, RT; et al. Sharp, AS; Davies, JE; Lobo, MD; Bent, CL; Mark, PB; Burchell, AE; Thackray, SD; Martin, U; McKane, WS; Gerber, RT; Wilkinson, JR; Antonios, TF; Doulton, TW; Patterson, T; Clifford, PC; Lindsay, A; Houston, GJ; Freedman, J; Das, N; Belli, AM; Faris, M; Cleveland, TJ; Nightingale, AK; Hameed, A; Mahadevan, K; Finegold, JA; Mather, AN; Levy, T; D'Souza, R; Riley, P; Moss, JG; Di Mario, C; Redwood, SR; Baumbach, A; Caulfield, MJ; Dasgupta, I (2016) Renal artery sympathetic denervation: observations from the UK experience. Clin Res Cardiol, 105 (6). pp. 544-552. ISSN 1861-0692 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0959-4
SGUL Authors: Antonios, Tarek Francis Tewfik

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Renal denervation (RDN) may lower blood pressure (BP); however, it is unclear whether medication changes may be confounding results. Furthermore, limited data exist on pattern of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) response-particularly in those prescribed aldosterone antagonists at the time of RDN. METHODS: We examined all patients treated with RDN for treatment-resistant hypertension in 18 UK centres. RESULTS: Results from 253 patients treated with five technologies are shown. Pre-procedural mean office BP (OBP) was 185/102 mmHg (SD 26/19; n = 253) and mean daytime ABP was 170/98 mmHg (SD 22/16; n = 186). Median number of antihypertensive drugs was 5.0: 96 % ACEi/ARB; 86 % thiazide/loop diuretic and 55 % aldosterone antagonist. OBP, available in 90 % at 11 months follow-up, was 163/93 mmHg (reduction of 22/9 mmHg). ABP, available in 70 % at 8.5 months follow-up, was 158/91 mmHg (fall of 12/7 mmHg). Mean drug changes post RDN were: 0.36 drugs added, 0.91 withdrawn. Dose changes appeared neutral. Quartile analysis by starting ABP showed mean reductions in systolic ABP after RDN of: 0.4; 6.5; 14.5 and 22.1 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.001 for trend). Use of aldosterone antagonist did not predict response (p > 0.2). CONCLUSION: In 253 patients treated with RDN, office BP fell by 22/9 mmHg. Ambulatory BP fell by 12/7 mmHg, though little response was seen in the lowermost quartile of starting blood pressure. Fall in BP was not explained by medication changes and aldosterone antagonist use did not affect response.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Keywords: Aldosterone, Catheter ablation, Hypertension, Sympathetic nervous system, Cardiovascular System & Hematology, 1102 Cardiovascular Medicine And Haematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Cardiac (INCCCA)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Res Cardiol
ISSN: 1861-0692
Language: ENG
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2016Published
22 January 2016Published Online
29 December 2015Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
FS/14/11/30526British Heart Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
FS/14/25/30676British Heart Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
MR/K006584/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
PubMed ID: 26802018
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107661
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-015-0959-4

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item