SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Impact of p16 status on pro- and anti-angiogenesis factors in head and neck cancers.

Baruah, P; Lee, M; Wilson, POG; Odutoye, T; Williamson, P; Hyde, N; Kaski, JC; Dumitriu, IE (2015) Impact of p16 status on pro- and anti-angiogenesis factors in head and neck cancers. Br J Cancer, 113 (4). pp. 653-659. ISSN 1532-1827 https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.251
SGUL Authors: Dumitriu, Ingrid Elena Kaski, Juan Carlos

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (5MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.doc) (deleted) Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (178kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancers (HNC) are aggressive tumours. Overexpression of p16 in HNC correlates with human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated HNC that carry a better prognosis than HPV-negative tumours. Angiogenesis is an important factor in tumour progression. Our aim was to dissect the impact of p16 expression on angiogenesis factors in HNC. METHODS: Eighteen newly diagnosed HNC patients and controls were analysed. Eleven pro- and anti-angiogenesis factors were quantified using multiplex ELISA in HNC patients and controls. Angiogenesis factors were analysed in tumour tissue using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Circulating levels of endostatin (anti-angiogenesis factor) were higher in the HNC group compared with healthy donors. Interestingly, the pro-angiogenesis factors angiopoietin-1 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly higher in patients with p16-negative compared with p16-positive HNC. Moreover, the major source of VEGF in p16-positive HNC tissue was tumour stromal cells. In contrast, both tumour cells and stromal cells expressed VEGF in p16-negative tissue. CONCLUSIONS: We show that p16-negative tumours associate with increased circulating levels of pro-angiogenic VEGF and angiopoietin-1. Tissue expression of VEGF differs between p16-positive and p16-negative tumours. These findings may explain differences in the biological behaviour of p16-positive and p16-negative HNC. Better understanding of mechanisms by which the p16 status influences tumour angiogenesis may guide the development of targeted therapies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: P Baruah, M Lee, P O G Wilson, T Odutoye, P Williamson, N Hyde, J C Kaski and I E Dumitriu, Impact of p16 status on pro- and anti-angiogenesis factors in head and neck cancers, British Journal of Cancer (2015) 113, 653–659. This article was originally published at http://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.251
Keywords: Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angiogenesis Inducing Agents, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Angiopoietin-1, Case-Control Studies, Disease Progression, Endostatins, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Proteins, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Prognosis, Stromal Cells, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Stromal Cells, Humans, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Disease Progression, Neovascularization, Pathologic, Angiogenesis Inhibitors, Angiopoietin-1, Endostatins, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A, Neoplasm Proteins, Angiogenesis Inducing Agents, Prognosis, Case-Control Studies, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Female, Male, angiogenesis factors, head and neck cancer, HPV, p16 expression, Oncology & Carcinogenesis, 1112 Oncology And Carcinogenesis
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) > Cardiac (INCCCA)
Journal or Publication Title: Br J Cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
11 August 2015Published
14 July 2015Published Online
9 June 2015Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PG/10/50/28434British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
PG/13/24/30115British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
PG/14/18/30724British Heart FoundationUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 26171937
Web of Science ID: WOS:000359438300011
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/107599
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.251

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item