SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Risk of lung cancer associated with domestic use of coal in Xuanwei, China: retrospective cohort study

Barone-Adesi, F; Chapman, RS; Silverman, DT; He, X; Hu, W; Vermeulen, R; Ning, B; Fraumeni, JF; Rothman, N; Lan, Q (2012) Risk of lung cancer associated with domestic use of coal in Xuanwei, China: retrospective cohort study. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 345 (e5414). pp. 1-10. ISSN 1756-1833 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5414
SGUL Authors: Barone-Adesi, Francesco

[img]
Preview
["document_typename_cannot open `/data/SGUL/sgul/eprints3/archives/sgul/documents/disk0/00/10/12/30/01/Risk' (No such file or directory) cannot open `of' (No such file or directory) cannot open `lung' (No such file or directory) cannot open `cancer' (No such file or director" not defined] Published Version
Download (381kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the risk of lung cancer associated with the use of different types of coal for household cooking and heating. Setting: Xuanwei County, Yunnan Province, China. Design: Retrospective cohort study (follow-up 1976-96) comparing mortality from lung cancer between lifelong users of “smoky coal” (bituminous) and “smokeless coal” (anthracite). Participants: 27 310 individuals using smoky coal and 9962 individuals using smokeless coal during their entire life. Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were absolute and relative risk of death from lung cancer among users of different types of coal. Unadjusted survival analysis was used to estimate the absolute risk of lung cancer, while Cox regression models compared mortality hazards for lung cancer between smoky and smokeless coal users. Results: Lung cancer mortality was substantially higher among users of smoky coal than users of smokeless coal. The absolute risks of lung cancer death before 70 years of age for men and women using smoky coal were 18% and 20%, respectively, compared with less than 0.5% among smokeless coal users of both sexes. Lung cancer alone accounted for about 40% of all deaths before age 60 among individuals using smoky coal. Compared with smokeless coal, use of smoky coal was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer death (for men, hazard ratio 36 (95% confidence interval 20 to 65); for women, 99 (37 to 266)). Conclusions: In Xuanwei, the domestic use of smoky coal is associated with a substantial increase in the absolute lifetime risk of developing lung cancer and is likely to represent one of the strongest effects of environmental pollution reported for cancer risk. Use of less carcinogenic types of coal could translate to a substantial reduction of lung cancer risk.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright © Barone-Adesi et al 2012 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
Keywords: Aged, Air Pollution, Indoor, Cause of Death, China, Coal, Cooking, Female, Heating, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Rural Population, Sex Distribution, Smoke, Smoking, Survival Analysis, Science & Technology, Life Sciences & Biomedicine, Medicine, General & Internal, General & Internal Medicine, MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL, HOUSEHOLD STOVE IMPROVEMENT, INDOOR AIR-POLLUTION, TIN MINERS, MORTALITY, MUTATIONS, SMOKING
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
ISSN: 1756-1833
Dates:
DateEvent
30 August 2012Published
PubMed ID: 22936785
Web of Science ID: 22936785
Download EPMC Full text (PDF)
Download EPMC Full text (HTML)
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/101230
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5414

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item