Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A systematic review of qualitative studies of adults’ experiences of being assessed for psychological therapies

Sweeney, AC; Clement, S; Gribble, K; Jackson, E; Carr, S; Catty, J; Gillard, S (2019) A systematic review of qualitative studies of adults’ experiences of being assessed for psychological therapies. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 22 (2). pp. 133-148. ISSN 1369-6513
SGUL Authors: Gillard, Steven George Sweeney, Angela Claire

PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (526kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (76kB)


Objective To synthesize the qualitative literature on adults’ experiences of psychological therapy assessments. The review was led by people with experience of undergoing assessments, with high levels of client involvement throughout. Search strategy A comprehensive search of electronic databases was undertaken, with additional search strategies employed to locate further literature. Inclusion criteria Studies were included that qualitatively explored the experiences of people aged 16+ who had been assessed for psychological therapy services. Assessments could be structured or unstructured. Qualitative was defined as any analysed account of people's experiences, including qualitative survey data. Data extraction and synthesis Literature quality was appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklist, modified to include client involvement and intersectionalities. Following data extraction, thematic synthesis was used to synthesize findings across studies. Results Of 12 743 titles were screened, with 13 studies relevant to the review. Themes and subthemes were identified at three stages of the assessment process: the journey to the assessment, at the assessment, and after the assessment. Findings highlighted the emotional impact of assessments, collaboration, intersectionalities, rights, pathologization, socioeconomic restrictions, and information and support needs. Implications and limitations were indicated. Discussion and conclusions Findings were situated within the trauma‐informed (TIA) literature. Trauma‐informed assessment principles, including collaborative assessments, may be fruitful means of improving people's experiences. Whilst the benefits of collaboration appear self‐evident, explicitly collaborative approaches were not the norm, nor were studies conducted independently. Further service user research is needed. A greater understanding of the experience of minority groups is also needed.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. © 2019 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Keywords: 1117 Public Health And Health Services, 1110 Nursing, 1701 Psychology, Public Health
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
ISSN: 1369-6513
25 March 2019Published
8 January 2019Published Online
3 October 2018Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PDF-2013-06-045National Institute for Health Research
Publisher's version:

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item