SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation with a pentaspline catheter across National Health Service England centres.

Mills, MT; Trivedi, S; Lovell, MJ; Murgatroyd, F; Calvert, P; Luther, V; Gupta, D; Martin, C; Zeriouh, S; Mellor, G; et al. Mills, MT; Trivedi, S; Lovell, MJ; Murgatroyd, F; Calvert, P; Luther, V; Gupta, D; Martin, C; Zeriouh, S; Mellor, G; Balasubramaniam, R; Sopher, M; Boullin, J; Arujuna, A; Chalil, S; Gall, S; Chen, Z; Saba, M; Buckley, U; Somani, R; Chin, SH; Jones, D; Kaba, RA; O'Neill, M; Wong, T; Todd, DM (2024) Pulsed-field ablation of atrial fibrillation with a pentaspline catheter across National Health Service England centres. Open Heart, 11 (2). e003094. ISSN 2053-3624 https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003094
SGUL Authors: Saba, Magdi Mohamed

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (741kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel modality for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We describe the initial uptake and experience of PFA using a pentaspline catheter across selected National Health Service England (NHSE) centres. METHODS: Data collected by NHSE Specialised Services Development Programme regarding AF ablation procedures using a single-shot, pentaspline, multielectrode PFA catheter (FARAWAVE, Boston Scientific) between June 2022 and August 2024 were aggregated and analysed to examine procedural metrics, acute efficacy and safety outcomes over 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: 1034 procedures were submitted. The patients were 32.1% female, mean age 63.8±10.7 years, 53.1% paroxysmal AF and 89.7% first-time AF ablation. Procedures were performed by 48 consultant operators at nine NHSE centres, with a mean of 115 procedures per centre (range 25-264). 93.7% of procedures were performed under general anaesthesia. Median skin-to-skin procedure time was 74 min (IQR 55-96 min) and fluoroscopy time 20 min (IQR 15-27 min). Electroanatomical mapping was used in 15.3%. In first-time ablation cases, acute isolation of all pulmonary veins was achieved in 99.5% of patients. Left atrial (LA) posterior wall ablation using the PFA catheter was performed in 11.0% of cases; additional LA radiofrequency ablation was performed in 0.6%. The major and minor acute procedural complication rates were, respectively, 1.3% and 3.1%, with no reports of periprocedural death or atrio-oesophageal fistula. 63.8% of patients were discharged on the day of procedure. Follow-up data were available for 870 procedures (84.1%). In the 3 months following ablation, hospitalisation for arrhythmia occurred in 3.2%, with 0.9% rehospitalised for procedural-related complications. CONCLUSION: In this real-world, nationwide registry of a pentaspline PFA catheter, efficacy, safety and efficiency outcomes were comparable to those from previous PFA studies in patients with AF.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
Keywords: Ablation Techniques, Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Electrophysiology, Humans, Atrial Fibrillation, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Catheter Ablation, England, Treatment Outcome, Pulmonary Veins, Equipment Design, Follow-Up Studies, Retrospective Studies, Cardiac Catheters, Aged, Time Factors, Pulmonary Veins, Humans, Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Treatment Outcome, Retrospective Studies, Follow-Up Studies, Equipment Design, Time Factors, Aged, Middle Aged, England, Female, Male, Cardiac Catheters, Atrial Fibrillation, Catheter Ablation, Electrophysiology, Ablation Techniques
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute
Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute > Clinical Cardiology
Journal or Publication Title: Open Heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Language: eng
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 39694575
Web of Science ID: WOS:001384835500001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117054
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003094

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item