SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Protocol for the UK cohort study to investigate the prevention of parastomal hernia (the CIPHER study).

Tabusa, H; Blazeby, JM; Blencowe, N; Callaway, M; Daniels, IR; Gunning, A; Hollingworth, W; McNair, AG; Murkin, C; Pinkney, TD; et al. Tabusa, H; Blazeby, JM; Blencowe, N; Callaway, M; Daniels, IR; Gunning, A; Hollingworth, W; McNair, AG; Murkin, C; Pinkney, TD; Rogers, CA; Smart, NJ; Reeves, BC (2021) Protocol for the UK cohort study to investigate the prevention of parastomal hernia (the CIPHER study). Colorectal Dis, 23 (7). pp. 1900-1908. ISSN 1463-1318 https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15621
SGUL Authors: Forrester, Hana

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (748kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Appendix S1) Supplemental Material
Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

AIM: Abdominal surgery sometimes necessitates the creation of a stoma, which can cause future complications including parastomal hernia (PSH), an incisional hernia adjacent to and related to the stoma. PSH affects approximately 40% of patients within 2 years of stoma formation. Complications of PSH reduce a patient's quality of life and can be severe (e.g. bowel obstruction). PSHs are difficult to manage and can recur after surgical repair. Therefore, it is very important to prevent a PSH. Surgeons create stomas in different ways and both patient and surgical factors are believed to influence the development of PSH. The aim of the CIPHER study is to investigate the influence of different surgical techniques on the development of PSH. METHOD: The UK cohort study to investigate the prevention of parastomal hernia (the CIPHER study) aims to recruit 4000 patients undergoing elective or expedited surgery with the intention of forming an ileostomy or colostomy, irrespective of the primary indication for the planned surgery. For each patient, surgeons will describe their methods of trephine formation, mesh reinforcement of the stoma trephine, use of the stoma as a specimen extraction site and wound closure. The primary outcome will be incident PSH during follow-up, defined as symptoms of PSH (custom-designed questionnaire) and anatomical PSH, ascertained by independent reading of usual care CT scans. Secondary outcomes will include surgical site infection, the Comprehensive Complication Index, quality of life (EQ-5D-5L and SF-12), PSH repair and use of NHS resources. RESULTS: Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. All publications relating to the results of CIPHER will use a corporate authorship, 'The CIPHER Study Investigators' with named writing committee members. CONCLUSION: The CIPHER study will be the first to investigate detailed surgical methods of stoma formation in a large, representative cohort of patients with a range of primary indications, both cancer and noncancer.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: cohort study, parastomal hernia, stoma, Cohort Studies, Colostomy, Hernia, Ventral, Humans, Incisional Hernia, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Quality of Life, Surgical Mesh, Surgical Stomas, United Kingdom, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Hernia, Ventral, Colostomy, Cohort Studies, Surgical Mesh, Quality of Life, Surgical Stomas, Incisional Hernia, United Kingdom, cohort study, stoma, parastomal hernia, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Surgery
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Colorectal Dis
ISSN: 1463-1318
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 July 2021Published
2 April 2021Published Online
1 March 2021Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MR/S001751/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
UNSPECIFIEDRoyal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009745
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research CentreUNSPECIFIED
MR/K025643/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
14/166/01Department of Healthhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000276
UNSPECIFIEDWeston National Health Service (NHS) Foundation TrustUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDUniversity of Bristolhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000883
14/166/01Health Technology Assessment programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664
PubMed ID: 33686656
Web of Science ID: WOS:000635929800001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116333
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.15621

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item