SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

An observational study of clinical outcome measures in patients treated with cannabis-based medicinal products on the UK Medical Cannabis Registry.

Erridge, S; Leung, O; Holvey, C; Coomber, R; Beri, S; Khan, S; Weatherall, MW; Rucker, JJ; Platt, MW; Sodergren, MH (2023) An observational study of clinical outcome measures in patients treated with cannabis-based medicinal products on the UK Medical Cannabis Registry. Neuropsychopharmacol Rep, 43 (4). pp. 616-632. ISSN 2574-173X https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12403
SGUL Authors: Coomber, Ross Steven

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (627kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S1) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (16kB)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While there is increasing evidence of the effects of cannabis-based medicinal products (CBMPs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a major limitation of the current literature is the heterogeneity of studied CBMPs. This study aims to analyze changes in HRQoL in patients prescribed a homogenous selection of CBMPs. METHODS: Primary outcomes were changes in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline. The secondary outcome was an adverse events analysis. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.050. RESULTS: 1378 patients prescribed Adven® CBMPs (Curaleaf International, Guernsey, UK) were included in the final analysis. 581 (42.16%) participants were current users of cannabis at baseline. 641 (46.51%), 235 (17.05%), and 502 (36.43%) patients were treated with oils, dried flowers, or a combination of the two, respectively. Improvements were found in all PROMs in each route of administration at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months from baseline (p < 0.010). Those prescribed dried flower only or both oils and dried flower experienced greater improvements in GAD-7, SQS, and EQ-5D-5L index values at 12 months (p < 0.050). There was no difference in outcomes between those prescribed dried flower only or dried flower with oils (p > 0.050). 3663 (265.82%) adverse events were reported by 297 (21.55%) patients. CONCLUSION: There was an associated improvement in self-reported anxiety, sleep quality, and HRQoL in patients treated with the CBMPs. Those prescribed treatment formulations including dried flower were most likely to show a clinical improvement. However, these results must be interpreted with caution given the limitations of study design.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 The Authors. Neuropsychopharmacology Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Neuropsychopharmacology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: anxiety, cannabidiol, cannabis, sleep, tetrahydrocannabinol, Humans, Cannabis, Medical Marijuana, Quality of Life, Hallucinogens, Oils, United Kingdom, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans, Cannabis, Oils, Hallucinogens, Quality of Life, Medical Marijuana, United Kingdom, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, anxiety, cannabidiol, cannabis, sleep, tetrahydrocannabinol
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Neuropsychopharmacol Rep
ISSN: 2574-173X
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
21 December 2023Published
6 December 2023Published Online
13 November 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 38057993
Web of Science ID: WOS:001115025800001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116025
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/npr2.12403

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item