SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A 'Hub and Spoke' Shared Care initiative for CTEV Ponseti service.

Hussain, SA; Russell, A; Cavanagh, SE; Bridgens, A; Gelfer, Y (2023) A 'Hub and Spoke' Shared Care initiative for CTEV Ponseti service. Bone Jt Open, 4 (11). pp. 865-872. ISSN 2633-1462 https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0076.R1
SGUL Authors: Gelfer, Yael

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (857kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Diagram of referral pathway of patients in the Hub and Spoke Shared Care Model; table showing complete congenital talipes equinovarus management schedule) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (191kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (ICMJE disclosure forms) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (479kB) | Preview

Abstract

AIMS: The Ponseti method is the gold standard treatment for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), with the British Consensus Statement providing a benchmark for standard of care. Meeting these standards and providing expert care while maintaining geographical accessibility can pose a service delivery challenge. A novel 'Hub and Spoke' Shared Care model was initiated to deliver Ponseti treatment for CTEV, while addressing standard of care and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and outcomes of the corrective phase of Ponseti service delivery using this model. METHODS: Patients with idiopathic CTEV were seen in their local hospitals ('Spokes') for initial diagnosis and casting, followed by referral to the tertiary hospital ('Hub') for tenotomy. Non-idiopathic CTEV was managed solely by the Hub. Primary and secondary outcomes were achieving primary correction, and complication rates resulting in early transfer to the Hub, respectively. Consecutive data were prospectively collected and compared between patients allocated to Hub or Spokes. Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or chi-squared tests were used for analysis (alpha-priori = 0.05, two-tailed significance). RESULTS: Between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2023, 92 patients (139 feet) were treated at the service (Hub 50%, n = 46; Spokes 50%, n = 46), of whom nine were non-idiopathic. All patients (n = 92), regardless of allocation, ultimately achieved primary correction, with idiopathic patients at the Hub requiring fewer casts than the Spokes (mean 4.0 (SD 1.4) vs 6.9 (SD 4.4); p < 0.001). Overall, 60.9% of Spokes' patients (n = 28/46) required transfer to the Hub due to complications (cast slips Hub n = 2; Spokes n = 17; p < 0.001). These patients ultimately achieved full correction at the Hub. CONCLUSION: The Shared Care model was found to be feasible in terms of providing primary correction to all patients, with results comparable to other published services. Complication rates were higher at the Spokes, although these were correctable. Future research is needed to assess long-term outcomes, parents' satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 Hussain et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC- ND 4.0) licence, which permits the copying and redistribution of the work only, and provided the original author and source are credited. See https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: Bone Jt Open
ISSN: 2633-1462
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 November 2023Published
12 September 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 37963491
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115867
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.411.BJO-2023-0076.R1

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item