SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Towards a Therapy for Geographic Atrophy: A Patient's Experience.

Enoch, J; Ghulakhszian, A; Sekhon, M; Crabb, DP; Taylor, DJ; Dinah, C (2023) Towards a Therapy for Geographic Atrophy: A Patient's Experience. Patient Prefer Adherence, 17. pp. 299-310. ISSN 1177-889X https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S386662
SGUL Authors: Sekhon, Mandeep

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: Geographic atrophy (GA) is the advanced form of the non-neovascular (dry) type of age-related macular degeneration. Presently, GA cannot be treated. However, new therapies administered by intravitreal injection are in late-stage development. These can slow down, but do not stop or reverse, GA progression. The acceptability of these emerging therapies to people with GA is currently unknown. The present case study explores the perspectives of a person living with GA who took part in the terminated Phase 3 clinical trial of Lampalizumab, a candidate intravitreal treatment for GA. We explored this patient's perspective on the retrospective acceptability of regular Lampalizumab injections, and the prospective acceptability of future intravitreal therapies for GA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 78-year-old woman living in the UK was recruited as part of a mixed-methods pilot study and interviewed by telephone, regarding: her experience of the Lampalizumab trial injections; and her thoughts regarding emerging intravitreal therapies for GA. The Framework Method was used for initial inductive analysis of the interview transcript. Subsequently, deductive analysis was undertaken, informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA). RESULTS: For this participant, intravitreal injections in the Lampalizumab trial were acceptable, although streamlining processes within the clinic would have improved the patient experience. Regarding prospective acceptability of new intravitreal therapies, the participant considered a delay in progression of GA a valuable goal. Potential discomfort, anxiety and inconvenience associated with regular intravitreal injections would be acceptable in the context of preserving her vision for as long as possible. CONCLUSION: Analysis of one participant's experience demonstrates the value of exploring GA patients' unique views on the acceptability of new intravitreal treatments. Larger prospective studies will provide more insight that help to optimise treatment design and delivery, thereby maximising likelihood of adherence and persistence when these therapies eventually arrive in clinic.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: acceptability, case study, geographic atrophy, qualitative, geographic atrophy, qualitative, case study, acceptability, acceptability, case study, geographic atrophy, qualitative, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Patient Prefer Adherence
ISSN: 1177-889X
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 February 2023Published
9 December 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
397National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
UNSPECIFIEDCity, University of London School of Health Sciences Higher Education Innovation FundUNSPECIFIED
AMR-000001Apellis Pharmaceuticalshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100019531
PubMed ID: 36756537
Web of Science ID: WOS:000927229900001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115825
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S386662

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item