SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Rationale and design of a randomized study comparing the Watchman FLX device to DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Kar, S; Doshi, SK; Alkhouli, M; Camm, AJ; Coylewright, M; Gibson, MC; Granger, CB; Gurol, ME; Huber, K; Mansour, M; et al. Kar, S; Doshi, SK; Alkhouli, M; Camm, AJ; Coylewright, M; Gibson, MC; Granger, CB; Gurol, ME; Huber, K; Mansour, M; Nair, DG; Natale, A; Pocock, SJ; Reddy, VR; Saliba, W; Christen, T; Allocco, DJ; Ellenbogen, KA; Leon, MB (2023) Rationale and design of a randomized study comparing the Watchman FLX device to DOACs in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J, 264. pp. 123-132. ISSN 1097-6744 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.022
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (610kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) was developed as a nonpharmacologic alternative to oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are at an increased risk for stroke or systemic embolism. The Watchman device permanently seals off the LAA to prevent thrombi from escaping into the circulation. Previous randomized trials have established the safety and efficacy of LAAC compared to warfarin. However, direct OACs (DOACs) have become the preferred pharmacologic strategy for stroke prevention in patients with AF, and there is limited data comparing Watchman FLX to DOACs in a broad AF patient population. CHAMPION-AF is designed to prospectively determine whether LAAC with Watchman FLX is a reasonable first-line alternative to DOACs in patients with AF who are indicated for OAC therapy. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 3,000 patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2 (men) or ≥3 (women) were randomized to Watchman FLX or DOAC in a 1:1 allocation at 142 global clinical sites. Patients in the device arm were to be treated with DOAC and aspirin, DOAC alone, or DAPT for at least 3 months postimplant followed by aspirin or P2Y12 inhibitor for 1-year. Control patients were required to take an approved DOAC for the duration of the trial. Clinical follow-up visits are scheduled at 3- and 12-months, and then annually through 5 years; LAA imaging is required at 4 months in the device group. Two primary end points will be evaluated at 3 years: (1) composite of stroke (ischemic/hemorrhagic), cardiovascular death, and systemic embolism compared for noninferiority, and (2) nonprocedural bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis [ISTH] major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding) tested for superiority in the device arm against DOACs. The third primary noninferiority end point is the composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism at 5 years. Secondary end points include 3- and 5-year rates of (1) ISTH-defined major bleeding and (2) the composite of cardiovascular death, all stroke, systemic embolism, and nonprocedural ISTH bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This study will prospectively evaluate whether LAAC with the Watchman FLX device is a reasonable alternative to DOACs in patients with AF. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04394546.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Am Heart J
ISSN: 1097-6744
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
3 July 2023Published
4 June 2023Published Online
28 May 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 37279840
Web of Science ID: WOS:001029984100001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115723
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2023.05.022

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item