SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Performance of prenatal cfDNA screening for sex chromosomes.

Martin, K; Dar, P; MacPherson, C; Egbert, M; Demko, Z; Parmar, S; Hashimoto, K; Haeri, S; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; et al. Martin, K; Dar, P; MacPherson, C; Egbert, M; Demko, Z; Parmar, S; Hashimoto, K; Haeri, S; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; Faro, R; Madankumar, R; Strong, N; Silver, RM; Vohra, N; Hyett, J; Rabinowitz, M; Kao, C; Hakonarson, H; Jacobsson, B; Norton, ME (2023) Performance of prenatal cfDNA screening for sex chromosomes. Genet Med, 25 (8). p. 100879. ISSN 1530-0366 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100879
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (445kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary tables) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (26kB)

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening to detect sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) in an unselected obstetrical population with genetic confirmation. METHODS: This was a planned secondary analysis of the multicenter, prospective SNP-based Microdeletion and Aneuploidy RegisTry (SMART) study. Patients receiving cfDNA results for autosomal aneuploidies and who had confirmatory genetic results for the relevant sex chromosomal aneuploidies were included. Screening performance for SCAs, including monosomy X (MX) and the sex chromosome trisomies (SCT: 47,XXX; 47,XXY; 47,XYY) was determined. Fetal sex concordance between cfDNA and genetic screening was also evaluated in euploid pregnancies. RESULTS: A total of 17,538 cases met inclusion criteria. Performance of cfDNA for MX, SCTs, and fetal sex was determined in 17,297, 10,333, and 14,486 pregnancies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of cfDNA were 83.3%, 99.9%, and 22.7% for MX and 70.4%, 99.9%, and 82.6%, respectively, for the combined SCTs. The accuracy of fetal sex prediction by cfDNA was 100%. CONCLUSION: Screening performance of cfDNA for SCAs is comparable to that reported in other studies. The PPV for the SCTs was similar to the autosomal trisomies, whereas the PPV for MX was substantially lower. No discordance in fetal sex was observed between cfDNA and postnatal genetic screening in euploid pregnancies. These data will assist interpretation and counseling for cfDNA results for sex chromosomes.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: /© 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Cell-free DNA, Fetal sex, Monosomy X, Sex chromosome aneuploidies, Sex chromosome trisomies, Pregnancy, Female, Humans, Trisomy, Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Prospective Studies, Chromosome Disorders, Sex Chromosome Aberrations, Aneuploidy, Sex Chromosomes, Turner Syndrome, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Prenatal Diagnosis, Sex Chromosomes, Humans, Turner Syndrome, Chromosome Disorders, Aneuploidy, Trisomy, Sex Chromosome Aberrations, Prenatal Diagnosis, Prospective Studies, Pregnancy, Female, Cell-Free Nucleic Acids, Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Cell-free DNA, Fetal sex, Monosomy X, Sex chromosome aneuploidies, Sex chromosome trisomies, 0604 Genetics, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Genetics & Heredity
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Genet Med
ISSN: 1530-0366
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
20 June 2023Published
5 May 2023Published Online
30 April 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 37154148
Web of Science ID: WOS:001035404100001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115688
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2023.100879

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item