SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Comparison of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease: a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial.

Nikoletou, D; Chis Ster, I; Lech, CY; MacNaughton, IS; Chua, F; Aul, R; Jones, PW (2023) Comparison of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training in pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease: a randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial. BMJ Open, 13 (8). e066609. ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066609
SGUL Authors: Nikoletou, Dimitra

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (3MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (67kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Figure 1) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (174kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Figure 2) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (136kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Figure 3) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (169kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Figure 4) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (169kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Table 1) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (93kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary Table 2) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (133kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary file 1) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (156kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary file 2) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (104kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Supplementary file 3) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (138kB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) compared with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for people with interstitial lung disease (ILD). DESIGN: Single-centre, randomised controlled feasibility, pilot trial. SETTING: Patients were recruited from the chest clinic of a tertiary ILD centre and attended circuit-based PR in the hospital's gym, followed by a personalised 6-month community programme. PARTICIPANTS: 58 patients, stratified per ILD type, were randomised into two groups: 33 to HIIT (18 males:15 females) (mean age (SD): 70.2 (11.4) years) and 25 to the MICT exercise mode (14 males:11 females) (mean age (SD): 69.8 (10.8) years). INTERVENTIONS: 8-week, twice weekly, circuit-based PR programme of exercise and education, followed by a personalised 6-month community exercise programme. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility outcomes included staff-to-patient ratio and dropout rates per group. Primary outcome was the 6 min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes included the sniff nasal pressure, mouth inspiratory and expiratory pressures, handgrip and quadriceps strength and health status. Random-effects models were used to evaluate average variation in outcomes through time across the two groups. RESULTS: The 6MWD peaked earlier with HIIT compared with MICT (at 4 months vs 5 months) but values were lower at peak (mean (95% CI): 26.3 m (3.5 to 49.1) vs 51.6 m (29.2 to 73.9)) and declined faster at 6 months post-PR. Secondary outcomes showed similar faster but smaller improvements with HIIT over MICT and more consistent maintenance 6 months post-PR with MICT than HIIT. CONCLUSIONS: HIIT is feasible in circuit-based ILD PR programmes and provides quick improvements but requires closer supervision of training and resources than MICT and benefits may be less well sustained. This would make it a less attractive option for clinical PR programmes. A definitive, multicentre randomised controlled trial is required to address the role of HIIT in ILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN55846300.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: interstitial lung disease, preventive medicine, rehabilitation medicine, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
22 August 2023Published
27 July 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PB-PG-1112-29067National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 37607782
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115592
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066609

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item