SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Medicolegal Cases in Bariatric Surgery in the United Kingdom.

Fehervari, M; Fadel, MG; Reddy, M; Khan, OA (2023) Medicolegal Cases in Bariatric Surgery in the United Kingdom. Curr Obes Rep, 12 (3). pp. 355-364. ISSN 2162-4968 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00508-1
SGUL Authors: Khan, Omar Ahmed

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (655kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the current state of bariatric medicolegal activity and explore the reasons of litigation in bariatric surgery. The underlying legal principles in bariatric medicolegal cases and most frequent pitfalls will also be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: There is a growing number of litigations in bariatric surgery, particularly relating to complications and long waiting lists for bariatric surgery within the public-funded health systems. The main issues are related to consent, lack of follow-up, delayed identification of complications and lack of appropriate emergency management of complications, involving bariatric surgeons, clinicians, general practitioners and multidisciplinary team members. Appropriate multidisciplinary involvement pre- and postoperatively and robust follow-up protocols can help to mitigate the risks. Bariatric surgery requires a unique paradigm with a multidisciplinary approach both pre- and postoperatively to improve the long-term functional outcomes of patients. There is a rising incidence of medicolegal claims following bariatric surgery. The underlying reasons for this are multifactorial including an increase in the volume of surgery, high patient expectations, the incidence of long-term postoperative complications and the requirement of long-term follow-up.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2023 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Breach of duty of care, Emergency surgery, Litigation, Negligence, Breach of duty of care, Negligence, Litigation, Emergency surgery, 1111 Nutrition and Dietetics
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Curr Obes Rep
ISSN: 2162-4968
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
September 2023Published
2 June 2023Published Online
5 May 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 37266862
Web of Science ID: WOS:000999703800001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115528
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-023-00508-1

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item