SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The quality and the accuracy of codes for terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies recorded in hospital databases in three countries in northern Europe.

Garne, E; Urhoj, SK; Bakker, M; Gissler, M; Given, J; Heino, A; Limb, E; Loane, M; de Walle, H; Morris, J (2023) The quality and the accuracy of codes for terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies recorded in hospital databases in three countries in northern Europe. Birth Defects Res, 115 (3). pp. 405-412. ISSN 2472-1727 https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2133
SGUL Authors: Morris, Joan Katherine

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The number of terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies in Europe (TOPFA) has increased over recent decades. Therefore, it is important that TOPFAs, in addition to all other birth outcomes, are included in the surveillance of congenital anomalies and in studies on possible teratogenic risks of pregnancy exposures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and the accuracy of codes identifying TOPFA cases in hospital databases. METHODS: TOPFA cases recorded in three EUROCAT congenital anomaly registries (Finland, 2010-2014; Funen in Denmark, 2005-2014; and northern Netherlands, 2013-2014) were linked to hospital databases using maternal IDs. RESULTS: A total of 2,114 TOPFA cases over the study period were identified in the registries and 2,096 (99%) of these pregnancies were identified in the hospital databases. An end of pregnancy code was present for 91% of the cases and a code for a congenital anomaly was present for 82% (with some differences across registries). The proportion of TOPFA cases with a code for a specific congenital anomaly was <50% for cases with a structural anomaly (range 0%-50%) and 70% for cases with a chromosomal anomaly. CONCLUSION: Hospital databases have limited information or codes to identify TOPFAs for specific anomalies and the data are not detailed enough for surveillance of congenital anomalies or for studies analyzing pregnancy exposures and risk of congenital anomalies. However, hospital data may be used to identify the occurrence of a TOPFA to enable more detailed information to be obtained from the medical records.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors. Birth Defects Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: accuracy of codes, congenital anomaly, hospital databases, surveillance, termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Birth Defects Res
ISSN: 2472-1727
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 February 2023Published
27 December 2022Published Online
8 November 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
733001Horizon 2020http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601
PubMed ID: 36573578
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115105
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/bdr2.2133

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item