SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Sensitivity and specificity of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in detecting patients with infection and sepsis in patients on sepsis pathway in the emergency department.

Cusinato, M; Sivayoham, N; Planche, T (2023) Sensitivity and specificity of monocyte distribution width (MDW) in detecting patients with infection and sepsis in patients on sepsis pathway in the emergency department. Infection, 51 (3). pp. 715-727. ISSN 1439-0973 https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01956-y
SGUL Authors: Cusinato, Martina Elisa Planche, Timothy David

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Excel (Supplementary file1) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (485kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary file2) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike.

Download (34kB)

Abstract

PURPOSE: Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a biomarker for the early identification of sepsis. We assessed its accuracy in patients presenting with suspected sepsis in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This was a single gate, single centre study in consecutive adults (≥ 18 years) admitted to the ED with suspected sepsis and clinical history compatible with infection, between 01 January and 31 December 2020 (n = 2570). RESULTS: The overall median MDW was 22.0 (IQR 19.3, 25.6). Using Sepsis-3 (qSOFA) to define sepsis, the Area Under Curve (AUC) for a receiver operator characteristic (ROC) relationship was 0.59 (95% CI 0.56, 0.61). Discrimination was similar using other clinical scores, and to that of C-reactive protein. At an MDW cutoff of 20.0, sensitivity was 0.76 (95% CI 0.73, 0.80) and specificity 0.35 (95% CI 0.33, 0.37) for Sepsis-3. MDW showed better performance to discriminate infection, with AUC 0.72 (95% CI 0.69, 0.75). At MDW 20.0, sensitivity for infection was 0.72 (95% CI 0.70, 0.74) and specificity 0.64 (95% CI 0.59, 0.70). A sensitivity analysis excluding coronavirus disease (COVID-19) admissions (n = 552) had no impact on the AUC. MDW distribution at admission was similar for bacteraemia and COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: In this population of ED admissions with a strong clinical suspicion of sepsis, MDW had a performance to identify sepsis comparable to that of other commonly used biomarkers. In this setting, MDW could be a useful additional marker of infection.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2022 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Biomarker, Emergency medicine, Infections, MDW, Monocyte, Sepsis, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Microbiology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Infection
ISSN: 1439-0973
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2023Published
18 November 2022Published Online
8 November 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 36399260
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115009
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01956-y

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item