SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Recovery in Mind: A Recovery College's journey through the Covid-19 pandemic.

Yoeli, H; Ryan, A; Hensby, C; Habermehl, F; Burton, S; Sin, J (2022) Recovery in Mind: A Recovery College's journey through the Covid-19 pandemic. Health Expect, 25 (6). pp. 3274-3286. ISSN 1369-7625 https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13635
SGUL Authors: Sin, Pui Han Jacqueline

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (954kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Covid-19 restrictions of 2020-2021 are known to have undermined the UK population's mental health. Working alongside staff, peer trainers and students at Recovery in Mind (RiM), a Recovery College (RC) in West Berkshire, England, this mixed-methods study is amongst the first to investigate how an RC has responded to the pandemic. METHODS: Working in co-production with RiM staff and peer-trainers, this study employed a mixed-methods design, gathering Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) well-being outcome measures by questionnaire and student experience, learning and co-production by interviews. FINDINGS: This research found that RiM continued to produce demonstrable improvements in student mental health. Students welcomed the way that RiM adapted to offering online and socially distanced provisions. Students valued the skills that RiM taught and the way that RiM courses reinforced prior learning; above this, however, they valued the mutual support and sense of community that participation provided. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the value of RCs maintaining 'hidden curriculums' of peer support and community involvement. This research emphasizes co-production as not only a tool for empowerment or service improvement but as a valuable skill for personal mental health recovery. Even when operating under the most unforeseen or challenging of conditions, RCs should always endeavour to prioritize and maintain co-production. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: In accordance with the RC ethos, this was an entirely co-produced study, with academic researchers and RiM staff and peer trainers working democratically in partnership with one another to design and manage the study and to write up and disseminate findings. To ensure the independence and rigour of findings, data analysis was undertaken by external academic researchers.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors. Health Expectations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Covid-19, Recovery College, co-production, peer trainers, well-being, co-production, Covid-19, peer trainers, Recovery College, well-being, 1110 Nursing, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1701 Psychology, Public Health
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Health Expect
ISSN: 1369-7625
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
26 November 2022Published
25 October 2022Published Online
7 October 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
010342269UK Big Lottery FoundationUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 36285350
Web of Science ID: WOS:000871785200001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114977
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13635

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item