SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Peripartum Screening for Postpartum Hypertension in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Giorgione, V; Khalil, A; O'Driscoll, J; Thilaganathan, B (2022) Peripartum Screening for Postpartum Hypertension in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy. J Am Coll Cardiol, 80 (15). pp. 1465-1476. ISSN 1558-3597 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.028
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma Thilaganathan, Baskaran

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic hypertension (CHT) is the main risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the effectiveness of peripartum screening in predicting CHT after HDP. METHODS: In this longitudinal prospective study, women with HDP underwent peripartum transthoracic echocardiography and were evaluated for CHT (blood pressure ≥140/90 mm Hg or on antihypertensive medication) at least 3 months postpartum. Univariable and multivariable analyses assessed the association between clinical and transthoracic echocardiography data and a postpartum diagnosis of CHT. RESULTS: At a median postpartum follow-up of 124 days (IQR: 103-145 days), 70 (33.2%) of 211 women remained hypertensive. Compared with normotensive women, women with CHT were older (35.5 ± 5.0 years vs 32.9 ± 5.6 years; P = 0.001), were more likely to be Afro-Caribbean (27.1% vs 7.8%; P < 0.0001), had higher body mass index (33.4 ± 5.9 kg/m2 vs 31.2 ± 5.4 kg/m2; P = 0.006), and had higher mean arterial pressure (106.5 ± 8.4 mm Hg vs 103.3 ± 7.0 mm Hg; P = 0.004). Moreover, they showed significantly higher left ventricular mass index (84.0 ± 17.9 g/m2 vs 76.3 ± 14.8 g/m2; P = 0.001), higher relative wall thickness (0.46 ± 0.10 vs 0.40 ± 0.10; P < 0.0001), and lower global longitudinal strain (-15.6% ± 2.7% vs -16.6% ± 2.2%; P = 0.006) than normotensive women. A prediction model combining clinical (maternal age and first trimester mean arterial pressure) and echocardiographic features (left ventricular mass index >75 g/m2, relative wall thickness >0.42, and E/e' ratio >7) showed excellent accuracy in identifying women with persistent hypertension after HDP (area under the curve: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.79-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: This peripartum screening approach might be used to identify women at risk of CHT who would benefit from intensive blood pressure monitoring and pharmacological strategies from the early postpartum period to prevent cardiovascular disease.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: cardiovascular prevention, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, pregnancy, Antihypertensive Agents, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Peripartum Period, Postpartum Period, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Pre-Eclampsia, Cardiovascular Diseases, Antihypertensive Agents, Prospective Studies, Postpartum Period, Pregnancy, Female, Peripartum Period, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: J Am Coll Cardiol
ISSN: 1558-3597
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
11 October 2022Published
3 October 2022Published Online
28 July 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
765274Horizon 2020http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007601
PubMed ID: 36202536
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114921
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.028

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item