SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Machine learning-based analysis of operator pupillary response to assess cognitive workload in clinical ultrasound imaging.

Sharma, H; Drukker, L; Papageorghiou, AT; Noble, JA (2021) Machine learning-based analysis of operator pupillary response to assess cognitive workload in clinical ultrasound imaging. Comput Biol Med, 135. p. 104589. ISSN 1879-0534 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104589
SGUL Authors: Papageorghiou, Aris

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pupillometry, the measurement of eye pupil diameter, is a well-established and objective modality correlated with cognitive workload. In this paper, we analyse the pupillary response of ultrasound imaging operators to assess their cognitive workload, captured while they undertake routine fetal ultrasound examinations. Our experiments and analysis are performed on real-world datasets obtained using remote eye-tracking under natural clinical environmental conditions. METHODS: Our analysis pipeline involves careful temporal sequence (time-series) extraction by retrospectively matching the pupil diameter data with tasks captured in the corresponding ultrasound scan video in a multi-modal data acquisition setup. This is followed by the pupil diameter pre-processing and the calculation of pupillary response sequences. Exploratory statistical analysis of the operator pupillary responses and comparisons of the distributions between ultrasonographic tasks (fetal heart versus fetal brain) and operator expertise (newly-qualified versus experienced operators) are performed. Machine learning is explored to automatically classify the temporal sequences into the corresponding ultrasonographic tasks and operator experience using temporal, spectral, and time-frequency features with classical (shallow) models, and convolutional neural networks as deep learning models. RESULTS: Preliminary statistical analysis of the extracted pupillary response shows a significant variation for different ultrasonographic tasks and operator expertise, suggesting different extents of cognitive workload in each case, as measured by pupillometry. The best-performing machine learning models achieve receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under curve (AUC) values of 0.98 and 0.80, for ultrasonographic task classification and operator experience classification, respectively. CONCLUSION: We conclude that we can successfully assess cognitive workload from pupil diameter changes measured while ultrasound operators perform routine scans. The machine learning allows the discrimination of the undertaken ultrasonographic tasks and scanning expertise using the pupillary response sequences as an index of the operators' cognitive workload. A high cognitive workload can reduce operator efficiency and constrain their decision-making, hence, the ability to objectively assess cognitive workload is a first step towards understanding these effects on operator performance in biomedical applications such as medical imaging.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: Cognitive workload, Convolutional neural network, Deep learning, Eye-tracking, Fetal ultrasound, Machine learning, Multi-modal data, Pupillometry, Sonography data science, Time-series analysis, Ultrasound imaging, Cognition, Machine Learning, Retrospective Studies, Ultrasonography, Workload, Ultrasonography, Retrospective Studies, Cognition, Workload, Machine Learning, Eye-tracking, Pupillometry, Cognitive workload, Ultrasound imaging, Time-series analysis, Sonography data science, Fetal ultrasound, Machine learning, Deep learning, Convolutional neural network, Multi-modal data, 08 Information and Computing Sciences, 09 Engineering, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Biomedical Engineering
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Comput Biol Med
ISSN: 1879-0534
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
28 June 2021Published
20 June 2021Published Online
15 June 2021Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
ERC-ADG-2015 694581European Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000781
EP/MO13774/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
PubMed ID: 34198044
Web of Science ID: WOS:000687697200004
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114771
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104589

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item