SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The development and validation of a decision aid to facilitate patient choice of surgery versus radiotherapy for high-risk basal cell carcinoma.

Banks, J; Odili, J; Zaidi, S; Lalondrelle, S; Singh, M; Akhras, V; Jiyad, Z (2022) The development and validation of a decision aid to facilitate patient choice of surgery versus radiotherapy for high-risk basal cell carcinoma. Clin Exp Dermatol, 47 (11). pp. 1995-1997. ISSN 1365-2230 https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.15325
SGUL Authors: Akhras, Victoria Jiyad, Zainab

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Image (JPEG) (Supplementary Figure S1) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (107kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is an increasingly common cancer. For high-risk BCCs, there are several treatment options, with similar efficacies. The current best practice in deciding upon a particular treatment is for a patient-centred approach. At present, there are few resources available for patients to assist their choice. This reduces patient autonomy and increases the burden on clinicians within clinic. Patient decision aids (PDAs) have been shown to increase patient autonomy and facilitate shared decision-making. Currently, there is no published PDA designed to facilitate the decision between surgical management or radiotherapy in high-risk BCCs. We developed a novel decision aid designed along the International Patient Decision Aid Standards to fill this clinical need, and evaluated its acceptance by both patients and clinicians. We describe the challenges faced at initial alpha and subsequent beta testing, and go on to validate our PDA with both the Decisional Conflict Scale and the nine-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDMQ9). We include an example of the PDA and encourage other units to modify the PDA for their own use.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: Humans, Decision Support Techniques, Patient Preference, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Decision Making, Shared, Skin Neoplasms, Humans, Carcinoma, Basal Cell, Skin Neoplasms, Decision Support Techniques, Patient Preference, Decision Making, Shared, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Dermatology & Venereal Diseases
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Exp Dermatol
ISSN: 1365-2230
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
21 October 2022Published
12 August 2022Published Online
3 July 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 35799319
Web of Science ID: WOS:000821831700104
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114535
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.15325

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item