SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The clinical progression and wound healing rate of dehisced perineal tears healing by secondary intention: A prospective observational study.

Adanna Okeahialam, N; Thakar, R; Sultan, AH (2022) The clinical progression and wound healing rate of dehisced perineal tears healing by secondary intention: A prospective observational study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 274. pp. 191-196. ISSN 1872-7654 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.035
SGUL Authors: Sultan, Abdul Hameed

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (241kB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish the clinical progression of dehisced perineal wounds healing by secondary intention and to investigate the incidence and factors associated with delayed healing. METHODS: Secondary analysis of women with perineal wound dehiscence recruited into the PERINEAL study between August 2020- August 2021 (NCT04480684). Three-dimensional wound measurements were taken with the Silhouette® camera. Significant bacterial colonisation was diagnosed using the MolecuLight i:X camera. As it is agreed that acute wounds should heal sufficiently within four weeks, diagnosis of delayed wound healing was made if a wound took longer than four weeks to heal. A wound was deemed to have healed if there was complete wound closure, with no evidence of granulation tissue or signs of infection on clinical examination. RESULTS: 55 women with perineal wound dehiscence participated. Wounds took an average of 3 weeks to heal (range 1-16) and 38 (69.1%) wounds healed in ≤ 4 weeks from the first clinical review. 17 (30.9%) wounds had significant bacterial colonisation, identified on bacterial fluorescence imaging. Women with a wound area of < 1.60 cm2 or wound perimeter of < 5.57 cm had a 70% probability of wound healing in ≤ 4 weeks. 47.1% of wounds with significant bacteria colonisation healed within 4 weeks, in comparison to 78.9% of wounds not colonised (p = 0.03). 25.0 % (n = 2) of wounds with OASI healed within 4 weeks, in comparison to 76.5% (n = 36) of wounds with no OASI (p = 0.02). Bacterial fluorescence (OR 0.21 (0.05-0.87)) and OASIs (OR 0.09 (0.01-0.66)) were independent risk factors associated with delayed wound healing. The model including wound area, fluorescence and OASIs had the greatest AUC (0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.94) indicating the best predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to describe healing outcomes of dehisced perineal wounds and factors associated with delayed healing. The study findings will help clinicians counsel women effectively and tailor follow-up care at the first assessment, based on individual risk factors.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries, Perineal wound dehiscence, Perineal wound infection, Secondary intention healing, Wound healing, Female, Humans, Lacerations, Perineum, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Wound Healing, Perineum, Humans, Lacerations, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Wound Healing, Female, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
ISSN: 1872-7654
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2022Published
31 May 2022Published Online
27 May 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 35667174
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114480
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.035

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item