SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The impact of working as a peer worker in mental health services: a longitudinal mixed methods study.

Gillard, S; Foster, R; White, S; Barlow, S; Bhattacharya, R; Binfield, P; Eborall, R; Faulkner, A; Gibson, S; Goldsmith, LP; et al. Gillard, S; Foster, R; White, S; Barlow, S; Bhattacharya, R; Binfield, P; Eborall, R; Faulkner, A; Gibson, S; Goldsmith, LP; Simpson, A; Lucock, M; Marks, J; Morshead, R; Patel, S; Priebe, S; Repper, J; Rinaldi, M; Ussher, M; Worner, J (2022) The impact of working as a peer worker in mental health services: a longitudinal mixed methods study. BMC Psychiatry, 22 (1). p. 373. ISSN 1471-244X https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03999-9
SGUL Authors: White, Sarah Jane

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peer workers are increasingly employed in mental health services to use their own experiences of mental distress in supporting others with similar experiences. While evidence is emerging of the benefits of peer support for people using services, the impact on peer workers is less clear. There is a lack of research that takes a longitudinal approach to exploring impact on both employment outcomes for peer workers, and their experiences of working in the peer worker role. METHODS: In a longitudinal mixed methods study, 32 peer workers providing peer support for discharge from inpatient to community mental health care - as part of a randomised controlled trial - undertook in-depth qualitative interviews conducted by service user researchers, and completed measures of wellbeing, burnout, job satisfaction and multi-disciplinary team working after completing training, and four and 12 months into the role. Questionnaire data were summarised and compared to outcomes for relevant population norms, and changes in outcomes were analysed using paired t-tests. Thematic analysis and interpretive workshops involving service user researchers were used to analysis interview transcripts. A critical interpretive synthesis approach was used to synthesise analyses of both datasets. RESULTS: For the duration of the study, all questionnaire outcomes were comparable with population norms for health professionals or for the general population. There were small-to-medium decreases in wellbeing and aspects of job satisfaction, and increase in burnout after 4 months, but these changes were largely not maintained at 12 months. Peer workers felt valued, empowered and connected in the role, but could find it challenging to adjust to the demands of the job after initial optimism. Supervision and being part of a standalone peer worker team was supportive, although communication with clinical teams could be improved. CONCLUSIONS: Peer workers seem no more likely to experience negative impacts of working than other healthcare professionals but should be well supported as they settle into post, provided with in-work training and support around job insecurity. Research is needed to optimise working arrangements for peer workers alongside clinical teams.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Keywords: Burnout, Community mental health, Employment, Interdisciplinary team working, Job satisfaction, Mental health services, Mixed methods research, Peer support, Psychiatric inpatient care, Wellbeing, Burnout, Professional, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Mental Disorders, Mental Health Services, Peer Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Peer Group, Job Satisfaction, Burnout, Professional, Mental Disorders, Mental Health Services, Surveys and Questionnaires, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
1 June 2022Published
13 May 2022Accepted
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
RP-PG-1212-20019National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 35650562
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114407
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03999-9

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item