SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in pregnancies at low and high risk for aneuploidy with genetic confirmation.

Dar, P; Jacobson, B; MacPherson, C; Egbert, M; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; Faro, R; Madankumar, R; et al. Dar, P; Jacobson, B; MacPherson, C; Egbert, M; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; Faro, R; Madankumar, R; Edwards, L; Haeri, S; Silver, R; Vohra, N; Hyett, J; Clunie, G; Demko, Z; Martin, K; Rabinowitz, M; Flood, K; Carlsson, Y; Doulaveris, G; Malone, C; Hallingstrom, M; Klugman, S; Clifton, R; Kao, C; Hakonarson, H; Norton, ME (2022) Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in pregnancies at low and high risk for aneuploidy with genetic confirmation. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 227 (2). 259.e1-259.e14. ISSN 1097-6868 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.019
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (607kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy (T) 21, 18, and 13 has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. However, prior studies are limited by lack of follow up genetic testing to confirm outcomes and accurately assess test performance, particularly in women at low-risk for aneuploidy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 between women at low and high-risk for aneuploidy in a large, prospective cohort with genetic confirmation of results. STUDY DESIGN: A multicenter prospective observational study at 21 centers in 6 countries. Women who had SNP-based cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was obtained from prenatal or newborn DNA samples. Test performance and test failure (no-call) rates were assessed for the cohort and women with low and high prior risk for aneuploidy were compared. An updated cfDNA algorithm, blinded to pregnancy outcome, was also assessed. RESULTS: 20,194 were enrolled at median gestational age of 12.6 weeks (IQR:11.6, 13.9). Genetic outcomes were confirmed in 17,851 (88.4%): 13,043 (73.1%) low-risk and 4,808 (26.9%) high-risk for aneuploidy. Overall, 133 trisomies were diagnosed (100 T21; 18 T18; 15 T13). cfDNA screen positive rate was lower in low- vs. high-risk (0.27% vs. 2.2%, p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity were similar between groups. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the low and high-risk groups was 85.7% vs. 97.5%, p=0.058 for T21; 50.0% vs. 81.3%, p=0.283 for T18; and 62.5% vs. 83.3, p=0.58 for T13, respectively. Overall, 602 (3.4%) patients had no-call result after the first draw and 287 (1.61%) after including cases with a second draw. Trisomy rate was higher in the 287 with no-call results than patients with a result on a first draw (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p=0.001). The updated algorithm showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the study algorhitm with a lower no-call rate. CONCLUSIONS: In women at low-risk for aneuploidy, SNP-based cfDNA has high sensitivity and specificity, PPV of 85.7% for T21 and 74.3% for the three common trisomies. Patients who receive a no-call result are at increased risk of aneuploidy and require additional investigation.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Keywords: aneuploidy, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), prenatal screening, trisomy, aneuploidy, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), prenatal screening, trisomy, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Am J Obstet Gynecol
ISSN: 1097-6868
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
20 July 2022Published
25 January 2022Published Online
11 January 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 35085538
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114138
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.01.019

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item