SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Prevalence of microcephaly: the Latin American Network of Congenital Malformations 2010-2017

Morris, J; Orioli, IM; Benavides-Lara, A; de la Paz Barboza-Arguello, M; Tapia, MAC; de Franca, GVA; Groisman, B; Holguin, J; Hurtado-Villa, PM; Ibarra Ramirez, M; et al. Morris, J; Orioli, IM; Benavides-Lara, A; de la Paz Barboza-Arguello, M; Tapia, MAC; de Franca, GVA; Groisman, B; Holguin, J; Hurtado-Villa, PM; Ibarra Ramirez, M; Mellado, C; Pardo, R; Pastora Bucardo, DM; Rodriguez, C; Zarante, I; Limb, E; Dolk, H (2021) Prevalence of microcephaly: the Latin American Network of Congenital Malformations 2010-2017. BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN, 5 (1). e001235. ISSN 2399-9772 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001235
SGUL Authors: Morris, Joan Katherine

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (318kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective The Latin American Network of Congenital Malformations: ReLAMC was established in 2017 to provide accurate congenital anomaly surveillance. This study used data from ReLAMC registries to quantify the prevalence of microcephaly from 2010 to 2017 (before, during and after the Zika virus epidemic). Design Nine ReLAMC congenital anomaly registries provided case-level data or aggregate data for any live births, still births or terminations of pregnancy with microcephaly. Births to pregnant women infected with Zika virus first occurred in Brazil in 2015, and in the remaining registry areas in 2016 with the exception of Chile that did not experience Zika virus. Therefore the prevalence of microcephaly for 2010–2014 and individual years 2015, 2016 and 2017 was estimated using multilevel random effect Poisson models. Clinical classification and characteristics of the cases were compared pre and post Zika for all centres providing individual case-level data. Results The prevalence of microcephaly for all registries excluding Brazil was 2.3 per 10 000 (95% CI 2.0 to 2.6) for 2010–2014 rising to 5.4 (95% CI 4.8 to 6.0) in 2016 and 5.9 (95% CI 5.3 to 6.6) in 2017. Brazil had a prevalence of 0.6 per 10 000 (95% CI 0.5 to 0.6) in 2010–2014, rising to 5.8 (95% CI 5.6 to 6.1) in 2015, 8.0 (95% CI 7.6 to 8.3) in 2016 and then falling in 2017. Only 29 out of 687 cases of microcephaly were reported as congenital Zika syndrome in countries excluding Brazil. Conclusions The prevalence of microcephaly was influenced both by Zika causing congenital Zika syndrome and by increased reporting awareness.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Keywords: epidemiology, data collection
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN
ISSN: 2399-9772
Dates:
DateEvent
23 November 2021Published
25 October 2021Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
734584Horizon 2020UNSPECIFIED
Web of Science ID: WOS:000722301400002
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/113914
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2021-001235

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item