SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Associations with Corneal Hysteresis in a Population Cohort: Results from 96 010 UK Biobank Participants.

Zhang, B; Shweikh, Y; Khawaja, AP; Gallacher, J; Bauermeister, S; Foster, PJ; UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium (2019) Associations with Corneal Hysteresis in a Population Cohort: Results from 96 010 UK Biobank Participants. Ophthalmology, 126 (11). pp. 1500-1510. ISSN 1549-4713 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.029
SGUL Authors: Owen, Christopher Grant

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (944kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe the distribution of corneal hysteresis (CH) in a large cohort and explore its associated factors and possible clinical applications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study within the UK Biobank, a large cohort study in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed CH data from 93 345 eligible participants in the UK Biobank cohort, aged 40 to 69 years. METHODS: All analyses were performed using left eye data. Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations between CH and demographic, lifestyle, ocular, and systemic variables. Piecewise logistic regression models were used to explore the relationship between self-reported glaucoma and CH. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Corneal hysteresis (mmHg). RESULTS: The mean CH was 10.6 mmHg (10.4 mmHg in male and 10.8 mmHg in female participants). After adjusting for covariables, CH was significantly negatively associated with male sex, age, black ethnicity, self-reported glaucoma, diastolic blood pressure, and height. Corneal hysteresis was significantly positively associated with smoking, hyperopia, diabetes, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), greater deprivation (Townsend index), and Goldmann-correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg). Self-reported glaucoma and CH were significantly associated when CH was less than 10.1 mmHg (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.79-0.94 per mmHg CH increase) after adjusting for covariables. When CH exceeded 10.1 mmHg, there was no significant association between CH and self-reported glaucoma. CONCLUSIONS: In our analyses, CH was significantly associated with factors including age, sex, and ethnicity, which should be taken into account when interpreting CH values. In our cohort, lower CH was significantly associated with a higher prevalence of self-reported glaucoma when CH was less than 10.1 mmHg. Corneal hysteresis may serve as a biomarker aiding glaucoma case detection.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cohort Studies, Cornea, Corneal Pachymetry, Cross-Sectional Studies, Elasticity, Ethnic Groups, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, United Kingdom, UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium, Cornea, Humans, Health Surveys, Regression Analysis, Cohort Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Age Factors, Sex Factors, Intraocular Pressure, Elasticity, Adult, Aged, Middle Aged, Ethnic Groups, Biological Specimen Banks, Female, Male, Corneal Pachymetry, Biomechanical Phenomena, United Kingdom, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomechanical Phenomena, Cohort Studies, Cornea, Corneal Pachymetry, Cross-Sectional Studies, Elasticity, Ethnic Groups, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, United Kingdom, Ophthalmology & Optometry, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1113 Opthalmology and Optometry, 1117 Public Health and Health Services
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Ophthalmology
ISSN: 1549-4713
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
November 2019Published
5 July 2019Published Online
28 June 2019Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MC_PC_17228Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
MC_QA137853Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
MR/L023784/2Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
UNSPECIFIEDDepartment of Healthhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000276
PubMed ID: 31471087
Web of Science ID: WOS:000490992500014
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/113786
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.06.029

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item