SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Virtual Reality and Physical Models in Undergraduate Orthopaedic Education: A Modified Randomised Crossover Trial.

Wilson, G; Zargaran, A; Kokotkin, I; Bhaskar, J; Zargaran, D; Trompeter, A (2020) Virtual Reality and Physical Models in Undergraduate Orthopaedic Education: A Modified Randomised Crossover Trial. Orthop Res Rev, 12. pp. 97-104. ISSN 1179-1462 https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S252274
SGUL Authors: Trompeter, Alex Joel

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (6MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Orthopaedic surgery is underrepresented in the United Kingdom medical school curriculum, with an average of less than 3 weeks of exposure over the five-year degree. This study evaluates the effectiveness of high-fidelity virtual reality (VR) and physical model simulation in teaching undergraduate orthopaedic concepts. Methods: A modified randomised crossover trial was used. Forty-nine students were randomly allocated to two groups, with thirty-three finishing the six-week follow-up assessment. All undergraduate medical students were eligible for inclusion. Both groups were given introductory lectures, before completing a pre-test with questions on the principles of fracture fixation and osteotomy. Each group then received a lecture on these topics with the same content, but one was delivered with VR and the other with physical models. Both groups completed the post-course assessments. Knowledge was assessed by way of questionnaire immediately before, immediately after, and six-weeks after. Results: In the VR group, participants improved their post-training score by 192.1% (U=32; p<0.00001). In the physical models group, participants improved their post-training scores by 163.1% (U=8.5; p<0.00001). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the total means of post-training test scores between the VR and the physical models study groups (U=260.5; p=0.4354). Conclusion: Both VR and physical models represent valuable educational adjuncts for the undergraduate medical curriculum. Both have demonstrated improvements in immediate and long-term knowledge retention of key orthopaedic concepts.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2020 Wilson et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms. php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
Keywords: learning curve, orthopaedic surgery, simulation, surgical training, undergraduate, virtual reality, orthopaedic surgery, simulation, undergraduate, surgical training, virtual reality, learning curve, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: Orthop Res Rev
ISSN: 1179-1462
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
11 August 2020Published
21 July 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0
PubMed ID: 32904645
Web of Science ID: WOS:000562022500001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112377
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.2147/ORR.S252274

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item