SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Roper, JC; Amber, N; Wan, OYK; Sultan, AH; Thakar, R (2020) Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury. Int Urogynecol J, 31 (11). pp. 2247-2259. ISSN 1433-3023 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04464-5
SGUL Authors: Thakar, Ranee Sultan, Abdul Hameed

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (384kB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) are the most severe form of perineal trauma with potentially devastating effects on a mother's quality of life. There are various national guidelines available for their management. The aim of this study was to review and compare recommendations from published national guidelines regarding management and prevention of OASI. METHODS: We searched the PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL and COCHRANE databases from January 2008 till October 2019 using relevant Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), including all subheadings. The guideline characteristics were mapped and methodological quality assessed with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool by three independent reviewers. To compare the methodological quality of the guidelines, the interpretation of the six domain scores were taken into consideration. By consensus of the authors, a score of 70% was taken as a cut-off, and scores above this were considered 'high quality'. RESULTS: Thirteen national guidelines on perineal trauma were included and analysed. Nine of these were specific to OASI. There is wide variation in methodological quality and evidence used for recommendations. AGREE scores for overall guideline assessment were > 70% in eight of the guidelines, with Australia-Queensland, Canada, the UK and USA scoring highest. CONCLUSIONS: The wide variation in methodological quality and evidence used for recommendations suggests that there is a need for an agreed international guideline. This will enable healthcare practitioners to follow the same recommendations, with the most recent evidence, and provide evidence-based care to all women globally.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: AGREE II, Guidelines., Obstetric anal sphincter injury, Recommendations, AGREE II, Guidelines, Obstetric anal sphincter injury, Recommendations, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Int Urogynecol J
ISSN: 1433-3023
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
November 2020Published
13 August 2020Published Online
23 July 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 32789813
Web of Science ID: WOS:000559451700002
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112347
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04464-5

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item