SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Red cell differential width (RDW) as a predictor of survival outcomes with palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer.

Patel, R; English, L; Liu, WK; Tree, AC; Ayres, B; Watkin, N; Pickering, LM; Afshar, M (2020) Red cell differential width (RDW) as a predictor of survival outcomes with palliative and adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer. Int Urol Nephrol, 52 (12). pp. 2301-2306. ISSN 1573-2584 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02565-0
SGUL Authors: Ayres, Benjamin

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (653kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: Red cell distribution width (RDW) measures red cells' size variability. Metastatic penile cancer displays poor chemotherapy response. As no validated prognostic predictor exists, we investigated whether RDW correlates independently with survival outcomes in metastatic penile cancer treated by chemotherapy. METHODS: Electronic chemotherapy files of patients with metastatic penile cancer (M1 or N3) from a large academic supra-regional centre were retrospectively analysed between 2005 and 2018. Patients were stratified into RDW > 13.9% and < 13.9%, as per published data on RDW in renal cell carcinoma. Survival time was calculated from the date of chemotherapy initiation until the date of death. RESULTS: 58 patients were analysed. The RDW-high group (n = 31) had a poorer survival than the RDW-low group (n = 27). Median overall survival (mOS) in all patients was 19.0 months (95% CI 13.1-24.9). mOS for RDW-high was 15.0 months (95% CI 10.1-19.9) and 37.0 months (95% CI 32.3-43.1) for RDW-low. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a clear disparity in survival (log rank p = 0.025). Cox proportional hazard ratio for death, corrected for T-stage, grade, age and deprivation score was 0.43 (p = 0.04). Sub-analysis of the M1 patients showed mOS in RDW-high of 17 m (95% CI 11.6-22.4) vs. NR; HR for death of 0.42. N3 patients' mOS in RDW-high cohort was 30 months (95% CI 4.5-55.9) vs. 13 months (95% CI 1.8-24.2) in RDW-low; HR for death was 0.30. CONCLUSION: RDW correlates independently with survival outcomes in metastatic penile cancer and may act as a potential predictor of survival outcomes for patients with metastatic penile cancer receiving chemotherapy.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Biomarker, Penile cancer, Red cell differential width, Survival outcomes, Penile cancer, Red cell differential width, Biomarker, Survival outcomes, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Urology & Nephrology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Journal or Publication Title: Int Urol Nephrol
ISSN: 1573-2584
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2020Published
23 July 2020Published Online
6 July 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 32705478
Web of Science ID: WOS:000551769300001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112222
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02565-0

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item