SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence?

Toia, B; Leung, LY; Saigal, R; Solomon, E; Malde, S; Taylor, C; Sahai, A; Hamid, R; Seth, JH; Sharma, D; et al. Toia, B; Leung, LY; Saigal, R; Solomon, E; Malde, S; Taylor, C; Sahai, A; Hamid, R; Seth, JH; Sharma, D; Greenwell, TJ; Ockrim, JL (2021) Is pre-operative urodynamic bladder function the true predictor of outcome of male sling for post prostatectomy incontinence? World J Urol, 39 (4). pp. 1227-1232. ISSN 1433-8726 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03288-8
SGUL Authors: Seth, Jai Hari

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (615kB) | Preview

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate pre-operative urodynamic parameters in male sling patients to ascertain whether this might better predict surgical outcomes and facilitate patient selection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, case notes and video-urodynamics, review of men who underwent AdVanceXP male sling in three London hospitals between 2012 and 2019. Urodynamics were performed in all centres, while retrograde leak point pressure (RLPP) was performed in one centre. RESULTS: Successful outcome was seen in 99/130 (76%) of men who required one pad or less per day. The dry rate was 51%. Pad usage was linked to worse surgical outcomes, mean 2.6 (range 1-6.5) for success vs 3.6 (range 1-10) although the ranges were wide (p = 0.002). 24 h pad weight also reached statistical significance (p = 0.05), with a mean of 181 g for success group versus 475 g for the non-successful group. The incidence of DO in the non-successful group was significantly higher than in successful group (55% versus 29%, p = 0.0009). Bladder capacity less than 250 ml was also associated with worse outcomes (p = 0.003). Reduced compliance was not correlated with outcomes (31% for success groups vs 45% for non-successful group, p = 0.15). Preoperative RLPP was performed in 60/130 patients but did not independently reach statistical significance (p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Urodynamic parameters related to bladder function-detrusor overactivity and reduced maximum cystometric capacity predict male sling outcomes and may help in patient selection for male sling (or sphincter) surgery; whereas urodynamic parameters of sphincter incompetency (RLPP) were not predictive. Further larger scale studies are required to confirm these findings.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Male sling, Men, Post prostatectomy, Stress urinary incontinence, Urodynamic, Urodynamic, Men, Post prostatectomy, Stress urinary incontinence, Male sling, 1103 Clinical Sciences, Urology & Nephrology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: World J Urol
ISSN: 1433-8726
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2021Published
6 June 2020Published Online
28 May 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 32506387
Web of Science ID: WOS:000538368900001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112157
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03288-8

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item