SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

ARTP statement on pulmonary function testing 2020.

Sylvester, KP; Clayton, N; Cliff, I; Hepple, M; Kendrick, A; Kirkby, J; Miller, M; Moore, A; Rafferty, GF; O'Reilly, L; et al. Sylvester, KP; Clayton, N; Cliff, I; Hepple, M; Kendrick, A; Kirkby, J; Miller, M; Moore, A; Rafferty, GF; O'Reilly, L; Shakespeare, J; Smith, L; Watts, T; Bucknall, M; Butterfield, K (2020) ARTP statement on pulmonary function testing 2020. BMJ Open Respir Res, 7 (1). e000575. ISSN 2052-4439 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000575
SGUL Authors: Bucknall, Martyn

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

The Association for Respiratory Technology & Physiology (ARTP) last produced a statement on the performance of lung function testing in 1994. At that time the focus was on a practical statement for people working in lung function laboratories. Since that time there have been many technological advances and alterations to best practice in the measurement and interpretation of lung function assessments. In light of these advances an update was warranted. ARTP, therefore, have provided within this document, where available, the most up-to-date and evidence-based recommendations for the most common lung function assessments performed in laboratories across the UK. These recommendations set out the requirements and considerations that need to be made in terms of environmental and patient factors that may influence both the performance and interpretation of lung function tests. They also incorporate procedures to ensure quality assured diagnostic investigations that include those associated with equipment, the healthcare professional conducting the assessments and the results achieved by the subject. Each section aims to outline the common parameters provided for each investigation, a brief principle behind the measurements (where applicable), and suggested acceptability and reproducibility criteria.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Keywords: lung physiology, respiratory measurement, respiratory muscles
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Biomedical Education (INMEBE)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open Respir Res
ISSN: 2052-4439
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
5 July 2020Published
14 February 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 32631927
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112148
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2020-000575

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 14 Jul 2020.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item