SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Human blood PIG-A mutation and micronucleated reticulocyte flow cytometric assays: Method optimization and evaluation of intra- and inter-subject variation.

Torous, DK; Avlasevich, SL; Khattab, MG; Baig, A; Saubermann, LJ; Chen, Y; Bemis, JC; Lovell, DP; Walker, VE; MacGregor, JT; et al. Torous, DK; Avlasevich, SL; Khattab, MG; Baig, A; Saubermann, LJ; Chen, Y; Bemis, JC; Lovell, DP; Walker, VE; MacGregor, JT; Dertinger, SD (2020) Human blood PIG-A mutation and micronucleated reticulocyte flow cytometric assays: Method optimization and evaluation of intra- and inter-subject variation. Environ Mol Mutagen, 61 (8). pp. 807-819. ISSN 1098-2280 https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22393
SGUL Authors: Lovell, David

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License ["licenses_description_publisher" not defined].

Download (5MB) | Preview

Abstract

We previously described flow cytometry-based methods for scoring the incidence of micronucleated reticulocytes (MN-RET) and PIG-A mutant phenotype reticulocytes (MUT RET) in rodent and human blood samples. The current report describes important methodological improvements for human blood analyses, including immunomagnetic enrichment of CD71-positive reticulocytes prior to MN-RET scoring, and procedures for storing frozen blood for later PIG-A analysis. Technical replicate variability in MN-RET and MUT RET frequencies based on blood specimens from 14 subjects, intra-subject variability based on serial blood draws from 6 subjects, and inter-subject variation based on up to 344 subjects age 0 to 73 years were quantified. Inter-subject variation explained most of the variability observed for both endpoints (≥ 77%), with much lower intra-subject and technical replicate variability. The relatively large degree of inter-subject variation is apparent from mean and standard deviation values for MN-RET (0.15 ± 0.10%) and MUT RET (4.7 ± 5.0 per million, after omission of two extreme outliers). The influences of age and sex on inter-subject variation were investigated, and neither factor affected MN-RET whereas both influenced MUT RET frequency. The lowest MUT RET values were observed for subjects < 11 years old, and males had moderately higher frequencies than females. These results indicate that MN-RET and MUT RET are automation-compatible biomarkers of genotoxicity that bridge species of toxicological interest to include human populations. These data will be useful for appropriately designing future human studies that include these biomarkers of genotoxicity, and highlight the need for additional work aimed at identifying the sources of inter-individual variability reported herein.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Torous, DK, Avlasevich, SL, Khattab, MG, et al. Human blood PIG‐A mutation and micronucleated reticulocyte flow cytometric assays: Method optimization and evaluation of intra‐ and inter‐subject variation. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2020; 61: 807– 819, which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22393. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Keywords: biomonitoring, chromosomal damage, flow cytometry, genotoxicity, mutation, Toxicology, 05 Environmental Sciences, 06 Biological Sciences, 11 Medical and Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Environ Mol Mutagen
ISSN: 1098-2280
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
16 October 2020Published
27 July 2020Published Online
18 June 2020Accepted
Publisher License: Publisher's own licence
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
R44ES028163National Institutes of Healthhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
PubMed ID: 32572998
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/112093
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/em.22393

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item